Loading...
Loading...
Found 44 Skills
Access comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.
Draft economics papers with proper structure and academic style
LaTeX academic paper assistant for English papers (IEEE, ACM, Springer, NeurIPS, ICML). Domains: Deep Learning, Time Series, Industrial Control. Triggers (use ANY module independently): - "compile", "编译", "build latex" → Compilation Module - "format check", "chktex", "格式检查" → Format Check Module - "grammar", "语法", "proofread", "润色" → Grammar Analysis Module - "long sentence", "长句", "simplify" → Long Sentence Analysis Module - "academic tone", "学术表达", "improve writing" → Expression Module - "logic", "coherence", "methodology", "argument structure", "论证" → Logical Coherence & Methodological Depth Module - "translate", "翻译", "中译英", "Chinese to English" → Translation Module - "bib", "bibliography", "参考文献" → Bibliography Module - "deai", "去AI化", "humanize", "reduce AI traces" → De-AI Editing Module - "title", "标题", "title optimization", "create title" → Title Optimization Module
Orchestrate manuscript revision by routing feedback to specialized writing skills
Write-up support for qualitative interview research in sociology. Guides methods and findings drafting with emphasis on argument-driven narrative, not formulaic quote display.
Use when reviewing or editing research manuscripts, journal articles, reviews, or perspectives. Invoke when user mentions manuscript, paper draft, article, research writing, journal submission, reviewer feedback, or needs to improve scientific writing clarity, structure, or argumentation in their manuscript.
Draft publication-ready Methods sections for interview-based sociology articles. Guides pathway selection, component coverage, and calibration based on analysis of 77 Social Problems/Social Forces articles.
Write and typeset economic models in LaTeX with proper notation
Create a novelty/prior-work matrix comparing the submission’s contributions against related work (overlaps vs deltas). **Trigger**: novelty matrix, prior-work matrix, overlap/delta, 相关工作对比, 新颖性矩阵. **Use when**: peer review 中评估 novelty/positioning，需要把贡献与相关工作逐项对齐并写出差异点证据。 **Skip if**: 缺少 claims（先跑 `claims-extractor`）或你不打算做新颖性定位分析。 **Network**: none (retrieval of additional related work is out-of-scope unless provided). **Guardrail**: 明确 overlap 与 delta；尽量给出可追溯证据来源（来自稿件/引用/作者陈述）。
Build a section-by-section claim–evidence matrix (`outline/claim_evidence_matrix.md`) from the outline and paper notes. **Trigger**: claim–evidence matrix, evidence mapping, 证据矩阵, 主张-证据对齐. **Use when**: 写 prose 之前需要把每个小节的可检验主张与证据来源显式化（outline + paper notes 已就绪）。 **Skip if**: 缺少 `outline/outline.yml` 或 `papers/paper_notes.jsonl`。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: bullets-only（NO PROSE）；每个 claim 至少 2 个证据来源（或显式说明例外）。
Use this when the user explicitly requests to "verify/optimize in-text citations of the `{topic}_review.tex` review" or to "run check-review-alignment". Use the host AI's semantic understanding to verify each citation against the literature content one by one. **Only when fatal citation errors are found**, make minimal rewrites to the "sentences containing citations", and reuse the rendering script of `systematic-literature-review` to output PDF/Word (the script does not directly call the LLM API locally). Core principle: **Do not modify for the sake of modifying**. When it is uncertain whether it is a fatal error, keep the original content and issue a warning in the report. ⚠️ Not applicable in the following cases: - The user only wants to generate the main body of a systematic review (should use systematic-literature-review) - The user only wants to add/verify BibTeX entries (should use a dedicated bib management process)
Draft a structured grant proposal from research ideas and literature. Supports KAKENHI (Japan), NSF (US), NSFC (China, including 面上/青年/优青/杰青/海外优青/重点), ERC (EU), DFG (Germany), SNSF (Switzerland), ARC (Australia), NWO (Netherlands), and generic formats. Use when user says "write grant", "grant proposal", "申請書", "write KAKENHI", "科研費", "基金申请", "写基金", "NSF proposal", or wants to turn research ideas into a funding application.