Loading...
Loading...
Found 17 Skills
Organize reusable programming patterns / library usages / technical skills that answer "To do this kind of thing, the correct approach is this" into a prescriptive reference library, which can be retrieved and reused as needed during feature-design and issue-analyze phases. Three types: pattern (design patterns, programming idioms), library (usage and pitfalls of a certain library/framework), technique (specific operation skills / command recipes). Trigger scenarios: When the user says "record a trick", "this usage is worth recording", "tricks", "record library usage", or when a skill worth archiving is discovered during feature-design / issue-analyze phases and actively pushed. Refer to `codestable/reference/system-overview.md` for how to distinguish it from learning / decisions / explore.
Break down a requirement that is "too large to be implemented as a single feature" into a list of sub-features with dependencies and statuses, and place it in the independent `codestable/roadmap/{slug}/` directory — serving as the seed and scheduling basis for subsequent multiple feature processes. Two modes: new (draft a new roadmap from a large requirement), update (refresh an existing roadmap: add items, modify dependencies, reorder, mark as drop). Division of labor with requirements / architecture — those two record "what the system is now", while the roadmap records "what we plan to do next". Trigger scenarios: Users say "I want an X system", "Help me break down this requirement", "Schedule this large requirement", "Create a roadmap", or it is found during the feature-design phase that the requirement is too large to fit into a single feature.
One-stop skill for the project architecture center — draft new architecture documents, refresh existing ones, or conduct an architecture health check. Automatically determine the mode based on user input: `new` (draft)/ `update` (refresh to latest code status)/ `check` (review without modification, generate issue list). The `check` mode has three sub-objectives: consistency within a single feature design, alignment between design and code, and consistency among multiple documents under `codestable/architecture/`. Single-target rule — only modify one document or check one target at a time. Trigger scenarios: User says "fill in an architecture doc", "draft an architecture document", "refresh the architecture directory", "write down this module structure", "conduct an architecture check", "is the design internally consistent?", "does the plan match the code?", "are there conflicts among several documents in the architecture folder?", or when an architecture action is required before proceeding during the feature-design / feature-acceptance / implement phases.
Execute implementation tasks from design documents using markdown checkboxes. Use when (1) implementing features from feature-design-assistant output, (2) resuming interrupted work, (3) batch executing tasks. Triggers on 'start implementation', 'run tasks', 'resume'.
Draft or update architecture documents under `easysdd/architecture/` — describe what a subsystem/module looks like currently, how it is divided, and how external interfaces operate, to provide pre-positioning input for subsequent feature-design. Information sources include code + user materials (oral accounts, scattered documents, compound deposits, existing decisions), and the output can be reverse-validated by anchoring to specific `file:line`. Two modes: new (draft a new architecture document from scratch), update (refresh an existing document based on the latest code status and new user materials). Single-target rule — only modify one document at a time. Trigger scenarios: user says "fill in an architecture doc", "draft an architecture document", "update the architecture directory", "write down the structure of this module", or when it is found that "something that should be in the architecture is missing" during the feature-design / feature-acceptance phase.
Discussion entry when ideas are still vague — first conduct triage through 1-2 rounds of dialogue to determine which downstream process this discussion should eventually go to: if the idea is clear enough, proceed directly to feature-design; if the direction of a small requirement is set, continue the discussion within the feature and document it in `{slug}-brainstorm.md`; if a large requirement cannot fit into a single feature, hand it over to roadmap for decomposition. The role of AI is a thinking partner, not a recorder — dig out the real problem the user wants to solve, proactively evaluate when the user brings a solution, and propose alternative directions when necessary. Trigger scenarios: when the user says "I have an idea that's not clear yet", "Let's brainstorm first", "I want to do something but it's still vague", "Let's talk about this area", "The function direction is still undecided", or when the user comes with a specific solution but wants to hear other ideas first. Bugs (go to issue) and refactoring (go to refactor) are not handled here.
Organize reusable programming patterns, library usages, and technical techniques that address "This is the correct way to do such tasks" into a prescriptive reference library, which can be retrieved and reused on demand during feature-design and issue-analyze phases. There are three types: pattern (design patterns, programming idioms), library (usage and pitfalls of a specific library/framework), technique (specific operation skills / command recipes). Trigger scenarios: when users say "Record a trick", "This usage is worth noting", "tricks", "Record library usage", or when valuable techniques worth documenting and archiving are discovered during feature-design / issue-analyze phases and actively pushed. For how to distinguish it from learning / decisions / explore, refer to the root skill of `easysdd`.
One-stop skill for the project architecture center — draft new architecture documents, refresh existing architecture documents, or conduct an architecture health check. Automatically determine the mode based on user input: `new` (draft)/ `update` (refresh to the latest code status)/ `check` (view only, generate issue list). The `check` mode has three sub-goals: consistency within a single feature design, alignment between design and code, and consistency among multiple documents under `easysdd/architecture/`. Single-target rule — only modify one document or check one target at a time. Trigger scenarios: User says "fill in an architecture doc", "draft an architecture document", "refresh the architecture directory", "write down the structure of this module", "conduct an architecture check", "is the design internally consistent?", "does the plan match the code?", "are there conflicts among several documents in the architecture folder?", or when it is found in the feature-design / feature-acceptance / implement phase that an architecture action needs to be performed first before proceeding.
Draft or update requirement documents under `easysdd/requirements/` for the project — describe a capability's "reason for existence, solution approach, and boundaries" using **user stories + plain language**, so non-technical readers can quickly grasp the key highlights of the system. Layered with architecture: requirement is the "problem space" (why this capability is needed), while architecture is the "solution space" (what structure is used to implement it). Two modes: new (draft a new requirement doc from scratch), update (refresh an existing doc based on new materials or implementation changes). Single-target rule — only modify one document at a time. Trigger scenarios: when the user says "fill in a requirement doc", "write down the requirements for this capability", "update the requirements directory", or when it is found during the feature-design phase that there is no corresponding requirement for the capability to be implemented this time.
Document the finalized tech stack selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent records. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four categories: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively trigger after making important choices during feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record the decision", "archive tech selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive proposed solutions under discussion.
Draft or update requirement documents under `codestable/requirements/` for the project — use **user stories + plain language** to describe a capability's "reason for existence, solution approach, and boundaries", so non-technical readers can quickly understand the highlights of the system. Layered with architecture: requirement is the "problem space" (why this capability is needed), while architecture is the "solution space" (what structure is used to implement it). Two modes: new (draft a new requirement doc from scratch), update (refresh an existing doc based on new materials or implementation changes). Single-target rule — only modify one document at a time. Trigger scenarios: the user says "fill in a requirement doc", "write down the requirements for this capability", "update the requirements directory", or during the feature-design phase, it is found that there is no corresponding requirement for the capability to be implemented this time.
Structured specification with explicit scope boundaries: user stories, acceptance criteria, out-of-scope definition, risks, and estimation. Positions before feature-design in the feature lifecycle pipeline. Use when: "write spec", "user stories", "define requirements", "scope this", "what should this do", "acceptance criteria", "define scope"