Loading...
Loading...
Found 13 Skills
Code review a pull request
Interactive PRODUCT.md generation. Interviews you about mission, personas, value props, and competitive landscape, then generates a filled-in PRODUCT.md. Triggers: "product", "create product doc", "product definition", "who is this for".
Use when handling code review feedback as the change author, addressing reviewer comments, drafting replies, resolving disagreements, or summarizing updates. TRIGGER on "address review feedback", "respond to this review comment", "reviewer asked", "I disagree with reviewer", "what should I reply?", or "apply PR comments". If role is unclear, ask reviewer or author. DO NOT TRIGGER for reviewer comment writing, full code review, or PR descriptions unless author-response behavior is requested.
Use when reviewing pull requests with comprehensive code analysis, incremental or full review options, and constructive feedback - provides thorough code reviews with severity ratings
Use this skill if the user asks you to help them address GitHub PR comments for their current branch of the Gemini CLI. Requires `gh` CLI tool.
Orchestrator that runs scope then language then framework then library then cognitive review skills in order and aggregates all findings into one report. Does not perform analysis itself.
Review current uncommitted git changes with full file context and produce a structured report with severity levels, actionable fixes, and an approval verdict.
Use this skill when the user asks to review their local git changes, staged or unstaged diffs, or wants a code review before committing. Triggers on "review my changes", "review staged", "review my diff", "check my code", "code review local changes", "review unstaged", "review before commit".
Bridge between OMO Prometheus and TKT ticket lifecycle. Generates structured review context for Prometheus after bundle close, converts Prometheus plans into TKT bundle commands, writes review feedback into the Review Agent Inbox, and provides a structured question protocol for gathering information efficiently. Load this skill when you need to: (1) generate a review prompt for a completed ticket/bundle, (2) convert a Prometheus plan.md into TKT worker tickets, (3) write review feedback back into the ticket system, (4) ask structured questions using the question tool across all scenarios (requirements, decisions, review, planning).
Use when reviewing code, pull requests, patches, CLs, diffs, or proposed implementations for engineering quality, code health, design, functionality, tests, maintainability, specialist risk, or approval risk. TRIGGER on "review this PR", "code review", "LGTM?", "approve?", "is this code/diff/change safe to merge/deploy?", and local diff reviews. DO NOT TRIGGER for PR descriptions, PR splitting, author review-feedback responses, or non-code safety questions unless code review is requested.
Use when the user asks for a broad codebase review, substantial PR/branch review, architecture audit, tech-debt scan, cleanup assessment, structural sanity check, or design-alignment review. Default workflow: use sub-agents when available unless specifically forbidden; do not require the user to mention sub-agents, council mode, delegation, or parallel review. Focus on cruft, duplication, weak boundaries, missed reuse, lifecycle/concurrency risks, test/roadmap drift, and code aesthetics. Do not use for narrow bug fixes, ordinary small-diff reviews, frontend visual QA, repo-onboarding docs, or OpenAI Agents SDK production-readiness review. Output evidence-backed findings first, then pressure points, design alignment, open questions, and follow-through.
Unified review skill — auto-detects plan or code, assembles the right panel, runs a bounded review-fix loop with severity gating. Use when a plan or implementation needs review.