Loading...
Loading...
Found 111 Skills
Comprehensive code review for diffs. Analyzes changed code for security vulnerabilities, anti-patterns, and quality issues. Auto-detects domain (frontend/backend) from file paths.
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
Create effective summaries by matching summarization type to purpose, audience, and context. Use when asked to summarize, create TLDR, condense content, or create executive summaries. Keywords: summary, TLDR, condense, executive summary, abstract.
Diagnose research quality and guide systematic query expansion. Use when starting research on any topic, when stuck in research, or when unsure if research is complete.
Review dependency PRs with structured research, existing-PR-discussion capture, multi-lens analysis (security, code quality, impact), and a repeatable verdict template. USE FOR: dependency update PRs, Renovate/Dependabot PRs, library upgrade reviews, "review this dependency PR", "should we merge this update". DO NOT USE FOR: feature PRs, application code reviews, dependency automation/bot configuration, or unattended merge without confirmation.
Runs a full CORE-EEAT 80-item content quality audit, scoring content across 8 dimensions with weighted scoring by content type. Produces a detailed report with per-item scores, dimension analysis, and a prioritized action plan.
Proactively analyze user requests at the start of conversations to determine task type, assess prompt quality, and intelligently recommend which skills to activate. Should activate for ALL user requests to ensure optimal workflow. Evaluates clarity, specificity, and completeness to suggest prompt-optimizer when needed. Identifies UI design tasks for ui-analyzer and component requests for react-component-generator. Acts as intelligent skill coordinator.
Pragmatic qualitative analysis for interview data in sociology research. Guides you through systematic coding, interpretation, and synthesis with quality checkpoints. Supports theory-informed (Track A) or data-first (Track B) approaches.
Perform comprehensive exploratory data analysis on scientific data files across 200+ file formats. This skill should be used when analyzing any scientific data file to understand its structure, content, quality, and characteristics. Automatically detects file type and generates detailed markdown reports with format-specific analysis, quality metrics, and downstream analysis recommendations. Covers chemistry, bioinformatics, microscopy, spectroscopy, proteomics, metabolomics, and general scientific data formats.
Evaluate test suite quality by introducing code mutations and verifying tests catch them. Use for mutation testing, test quality, mutant detection, Stryker, PITest, and test effectiveness analysis.
API contract audit worker (L3). Checks layer leakage in method signatures, missing DTOs, entity leakage to API, inconsistent error contracts, redundant method overloads. Returns findings with 4-score model (compliance, completeness, quality, implementation).
Technical solution evaluation and code review in the style of Linus Torvalds. Only use this when the user explicitly requests a Linus-style review or explicitly asks for a rigorous evaluation of code changes/technical solutions (e.g., "review changes/code", "evaluate if the solution is appropriate", "check submission standards", "linus-tech-review").