Loading...
Loading...
Found 166 Skills
Forces adversarial reasoning before committing to decisions. Triggers on architectural choices, approach selection, and planning phases to prevent premature commitment bias.
Help users run more effective meetings. Use when someone is dealing with meeting overload, wants to improve meeting culture, is preparing an important meeting, or struggles to get decisions made in meetings.
Pre-mortem analysis that imagines a plan has failed, then works backward to identify causes and preventions. Use before launches, major decisions, or risky initiatives to surface hidden risks.
Walk through decisions using a 3-part framework (first-principles, cost/benefit, second-order effects). Use when choosing between options, evaluating trade-offs, or making high-stakes decisions.
Run a Virtual Think Tank — a structured multi-persona debate — before planning or making architectural/design/strategic decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is about to plan a system, make a technology choice, evaluate trade-offs, decide on an approach, or faces any decision where multiple perspectives would sharpen the outcome. Also trigger when the user says "think tank", "debate this", "perspectives on", "trade-offs", "should I use X or Y", "help me decide", "before we plan", or asks for pros/cons of competing approaches. This skill should run BEFORE any implementation planning begins — it produces a structured analysis that feeds into better plans.
Use when you need to generate many creative options before systematically narrowing to the best choices. Invoke when exploring product ideas, solving open-ended problems, generating strategic alternatives, developing research questions, designing experiments, or when you need both breadth (many ideas) and rigor (principled selection). Use when user mentions brainstorming, ideation, divergent thinking, generating options, or evaluating alternatives.
Use when stakeholders have conflicting priorities and need alignment, suspect decision blind spots from single perspective, need to pressure-test proposals before presenting, want empathy for different viewpoints (eng vs PM vs legal vs user), building consensus across functions, evaluating tradeoffs with multi-dimensional impact, or when user mentions "what would X think", "stakeholder alignment", "see from their perspective", "blind spots", or "conflicting interests".
Apply first-principles thinking to break down complex problems into fundamental truths and rebuild solutions from the ground up. Use when solving strategic decisions, breaking through blockers, or challenging assumptions. Triggers on first principles, Elon Musk methodology, fundamental truths, strip assumptions, physics of the problem, rebuild from scratch.
Spawn 5 Opus subagents with randomly-generated distinct personas to debate a problem from multiple angles. Use when exploring UX decisions, architecture choices, or any decision that benefits from diverse perspectives arguing creatively.
Run a structured multi-perspective council on a hard decision, design choice, debugging question, strategy problem, or tradeoff. Use when the user wants multiple viewpoints, explicit cross-examination, and a compact final verdict.
Produces structured judgment briefs for contested situations — news events, decisions, conflicts, strategy questions. Surfaces hidden bets, real disagreements, unspeakable truths, and who concretely pays. Use when the user wants sharper thinking about something messy, not a summary.
V4.1 Reverse Pricing Calculator, used for profit judgment in cross-border e-commerce Temu product selection. This skill is employed when users need to calculate the net profit of products on the Temu platform, verify if it meets the profit threshold (net profit > ¥5), and conduct reverse pricing analysis. Input the Temu lowest competitor price and 1688 sourcing price, and output the detailed profit calculation process and GO/PASS decision.