Loading...
Loading...
Found 277 Skills
Generate a Well-Architected-aligned Architecture Decision Record (ADR) that documents a design decision with context, options evaluated, trade-offs, and WA pillar impact.
Automated BDD scenario generation from EARS requirements - generates Gherkin Given-When-Then scenarios with ADR-Ready scoring
Finds all REFACTOR markers in codebase, validates associated ADRs exist, identifies stale markers (30+ days old), and detects orphaned markers (no ADR reference). Use during status checks, before feature completion, or for refactor health audits. Triggers on "check refactor status", "marker health", "what's the status", or PROACTIVELY before marking features complete. Works with Python (.py), TypeScript (.ts), and JavaScript (.js) files using grep patterns to locate markers and validate against ADR files in docs/adr/ directories.
Technical documentation patterns for READMEs, ADRs, API docs (OpenAPI 3.1), changelogs, and writing style guides. Use when creating project documentation, writing architecture decisions, documenting APIs, or maintaining changelogs.
Document finalized technology selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent documents. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four types: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively push when important choices are made after feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record decision", "archive technology selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive under-discussion solutions.
Document the finalized tech stack selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent records. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four categories: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively trigger after making important choices during feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record the decision", "archive tech selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive proposed solutions under discussion.
Consumer-side wiring for ADR-097 Phase 3 federation_spend events — per-peer rolling windows + suspension-threshold check
Helps engineering managers break down knowledge silos and build sustainable documentation and collaboration practices — produces a four-root-cause diagnostic for silos, an Engineering Guilds framework, a minimum-viable documentation approach using ADRs, a structured onboarding model, and a cross-team request decision framework. Use when the user says "knowledge silos," "reinventing the wheel," "nobody reads docs," "onboarding is bad," "teams don't talk," "documentation culture," "cross-team friction," "information doesn't flow," or "new hires struggle to ramp up."
Translate approved GDDs + architecture into epics — one epic per architectural module. Defines scope, governing ADRs, engine risk, and untraced requirements. Does NOT break into stories — run /create-stories [epic-slug] after each epic is created.
Read a story file and implement it. Loads the full context (story, GDD requirement, ADR guidelines, control manifest), routes to the right programmer agent for the system and engine, implements the code and test, and confirms each acceptance criterion. The core implementation skill — run after /story-readiness, before /code-review and /story-done.
Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all GDDs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every GDD technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies engine compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict. The architecture equivalent of /design-review.
Guided, section-by-section authoring of the master architecture document for the game. Reads all GDDs, the systems index, existing ADRs, and the engine reference library to produce a complete architecture blueprint before any code is written. Engine-version-aware: flags knowledge gaps and validates decisions against the pinned engine version.