Loading...
Loading...
Found 207 Skills
Identifies anti-patterns specific to amplihack philosophy. Use when reviewing code for quality issues or refactoring. Detects: over-abstraction, complex inheritance, large functions (>50 lines), tight coupling, missing __all__ exports. Provides specific fixes and explanations for each smell.
Catalog of MSBuild anti-patterns with detection rules and fix recipes. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. Use when reviewing, auditing, or cleaning up .csproj, .vbproj, .fsproj, .props, .targets, or .proj files. Each anti-pattern has a symptom, explanation, and concrete BAD→GOOD transformation. DO NOT use for non-MSBuild build systems (npm, Maven, CMake, etc.).
WordPress performance code review and optimization analysis. Use when reviewing WordPress PHP code for performance issues, auditing themes/plugins for scalability, optimizing WP_Query, analyzing caching strategies, checking code before launch, or detecting anti-patterns, or when user mentions "performance review", "optimization audit", "slow WordPress", "slow queries", "high-traffic", "scale WordPress", "code review", "timeout", "500 error", "out of memory", or "site won't load". Detects anti-patterns in database queries, hooks, object caching, AJAX, and template loading.
Cucumber best practices, patterns, and anti-patterns
Use when implementing Network.framework connections (NWConnection, NetworkConnection), debugging connection failures, migrating from sockets/URLSession streams, or handling network transitions. Covers UDP/TCP patterns, structured concurrency networking (iOS 26+), and common anti-patterns.
Audit project directory structure for colocation, grouping, and anti-patterns. Use when creating files, organising components, or deciding where code should live.
Load PROACTIVELY when task involves reviewing code, auditing quality, or validating implementations. Use when user says "review this code", "check this PR", "audit the codebase", or "score this implementation". Covers the 10-dimension weighted scoring rubric (correctness, security, performance, architecture, testing, error handling, type safety, maintainability, accessibility, documentation), automated pattern detection for anti-patterns, and structured review output with actionable findings.
Expert guidance for designing Azure solutions using Azure Architecture. Covers reference architectures, solution ideas, design patterns, technology choices, architecture styles, best practices, anti-patterns, example workloads, and migration guides. Use when selecting architecture patterns, choosing Azure services, or implementing production-ready solutions.
Framework-specific accessibility patterns, common pitfalls, and code fix templates for React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and Tailwind CSS. Use when generating framework-aware accessibility fixes or checking framework-specific anti-patterns.
Reference data for .NET test framework detection patterns, assertion APIs, skip annotations, setup/teardown methods, and common test smell indicators across MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE directly — loaded by test analysis skills (test-anti-patterns, exp-test-smell-detection, exp-assertion-quality, exp-test-maintainability, exp-test-tagging) when they need framework-specific lookup tables.
Validates SKILL.md files against Claude Code skill best practices. Checks conciseness, description quality, progressive disclosure, workflow structure, and common anti-patterns. Use when reviewing or auditing skills before shipping.
Automated, project-wide code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score analysis for .NET projects with existing unit tests. Auto-detects solution structure, runs coverage collection via `dotnet test` (supports both Microsoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage and Coverlet), generates reports via ReportGenerator, calculates CRAP scores per method, and surfaces risk hotspots — complex code with low test coverage that is dangerous to modify. Use when the user wants project-wide coverage analysis with risk prioritization, coverage gap identification, CRAP score computation across an entire solution, or to diagnose why coverage is stuck or plateaued and identify what methods are blocking improvement. DO NOT USE FOR: targeted single-method CRAP analysis (use crap-score skill), writing tests, running tests without coverage collection, applying test filters, producing TRX reports, or troubleshooting test execution (use run-tests for all of these).