Loading...
Loading...
Found 817 Skills
Review current uncommitted git changes with full file context and produce a structured report with severity levels, actionable fixes, and an approval verdict.
Guide for using ruff, the extremely fast Python linter and formatter. Use this when linting, formatting, or fixing Python code.
Comprehensive review of local uncommitted changes using specialized agents with code improvement suggestions
Expert code review of current git changes with a senior engineer lens. Detects SOLID violations, security risks, and proposes actionable improvements.
Use when the user asks to perform a code review, review code changes, analyze a diff, or audit code quality. Runs a structured review of git diff output covering security, correctness, performance, maintainability, and style. Produces a markdown report saved as a .md file named after the current branch.
Analyze and resolve Sentry comments on GitHub Pull Requests. Use this when asked to review or fix issues identified by Sentry in PR comments. Can review specific PRs by number or automatically find recent PRs with Sentry feedback.
LOAD THIS SKILL when: reviewing code before PR, user mentions 'code review', 'review', 'pre-PR check', 'code quality audit'. Contains project-specific review checklist covering TRPC, TanStack, Drizzle, security, performance, and Effect patterns.
SonarQube/SonarCloud integration for continuous code quality. Setup, configuration, quality gates, and CI/CD integration. USE WHEN: user mentions "SonarQube", "SonarCloud", "quality gates", asks about "code coverage", "technical debt", "code smells", "sonar-project.properties", "SonarScanner" DO NOT USE FOR: ESLint/Biome - use linting skills, OWASP security - use security skills, testing tools - use Vitest/Playwright skills
Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware: breaks down per-person contributions with praise and growth areas.
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues.
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Three modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials).
Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations.