Loading...
Loading...
Found 163 Skills
Write/restructure the "(3) Research Basis" section of the NSFC main text, and simultaneously organize "Working Conditions" and "Research Risk Responses". Use an evidence chain to prove the project is feasible, resource conditions align with research content, and risk contingency plans are executable. Suitable for scenarios where users need to write/revise sections such as "Research Basis, Preliminary Work, Feasibility Analysis, Working Conditions, Platform Team, Risk Responses".
Use this when the user explicitly requests to "write/polish NSFC grant abstract", "generate Chinese and English abstracts", or "translate Chinese abstract to English abstract". Output both Chinese and English versions: The English version must be a faithful translation of the Chinese version (no additional information, no omission of key constraints). The default limit for Chinese abstract is ≤400 characters (including punctuation), and ≤4000 characters for English abstract (including punctuation); the final limit shall prevail as specified in `skills/nsfc-abstract/config.yaml:limits`. Also output **title suggestions**: By default, provide 1 recommended title + 5 candidate titles with justifications (the quantity shall follow `config.yaml:title.title_candidates_default`). Output method: Write the results to `NSFC-ABSTRACTS.md` in the **working directory** (the file name shall follow `config.yaml:output.filename`), which includes in order `# Title Suggestions`, Chinese abstract, English abstract, and length self-check. ⚠️ Not applicable in the following cases: - The user only wants to translate a general text unrelated to grant proposals (direct translation is required instead) - The user only wants to write the main body of project justification/research content/research foundation (use the corresponding NSFC series skill instead)
Based on the page length budget standards for NSFC (National Natural Science Foundation of China) proposals; check the page length of the target proposal and summarize gaps; provide targeted optimization suggestions; expand or compress content to meet standards while preserving the original meaning as much as possible.
Extract structured review themes from any input source: supports files (PDF/Word/Markdown/Tex), folders, images, natural language descriptions, web URLs, etc.; automatically identifies input types and extracts content; generates structured output of "Theme + Keywords + Core Questions" which can be directly used for systematic-literature-review and other literature review skills.
NSFC Grant Citation and Bib Management: Add/verify paper information (title/author/year/journal/DOI) and write to `references/ccs.bib` or `references/mypaper.bib`, ensuring no hallucinated citations; applicable when users request "add citations/supplement references/verify paper information/write bibtex/update .bib".
Use the Claude Code CLI to consult Claude and delegate coding tasks for prototyping, debugging, and code review. Supports multi-turn sessions via SESSION_ID. Optimized for low-token, file/line-based handoff.
This skill is used when users explicitly request "review NSFC proposals", "simulate expert review", or "evaluate NSFC applications". It simulates the perspective of domain experts to conduct multi-dimensional reviews of NSFC proposals, outputting graded issues and actionable modification suggestions. ⚠️ Not applicable: when users only want to write/modify a specific section of a proposal (use the nsfc-*-writer series skills instead), only want to understand review criteria (answer directly), or have no clear "review/evaluate" intent.
Use this tool when the user explicitly requests "update project guide", "sync guide", or "deposit insights into the guide". It saves newly generated reusable writing insights from conversations to the project guide file in real time, ensuring consistent terminology, stable structure, verifiability and reproducibility. The guide file path must be specified when invoking.
Interpret the meaning of paper figures and output a highly readable Markdown report that 'teaches humans how to read figures'; supports input of absolute paths to one or more figure files and manual interpretations, automatically attempts to retrieve the source code used to generate the figures from the vicinity of the figures, and uses a parallel-vibe-like approach to interpret each figure with process-level isolation via `codex exec`/`claude -p` (default concurrency limit is 3, adjustable in config.yaml). ⚠️ Not applicable: Users only want to adjust figure size/crop/change format; or request direct modification of images/source code (this skill has read-only access to images and source code throughout, modification is strictly prohibited).
Check the consistency and authenticity risks of citations and references in NSFC proposal text (read-only): Verify the existence of bibkey, format issues such as BibTeX fields and DOI, and generate structured input for the host AI to evaluate item-by-item whether the text expression actually cites the literature; by default, only an audit report is output, and the proposal or .bib file is not directly modified (unless the user explicitly requests it).
Create research posters using HTML/CSS that can be exported to PDF or PPTX. Use this skill ONLY when the user explicitly requests PowerPoint/PPTX poster format. For standard research posters, use latex-posters instead. This skill provides modern web-based poster design with responsive layouts and easy visual integration.
Transform lecture materials (slides, PDFs, text snippets, transcripts) into comprehensive, exam-ready Markdown notes for Obsidian. Use when the user provides lecture content, study materials, or asks to take notes, summarize lectures, or create study guides. Outputs structured notes with key concepts, definitions, LaTeX math, and exam-important callouts.