Loading...
Loading...
Found 172 Skills
Use when drafting, revising, structuring, reviewing, polishing, or preparing academic manuscripts, proposals, related work, LaTeX papers, abstracts, introductions, methods, limitations, or submission-ready scholarly text.
Use when choosing, comparing, or preparing for computer science venues, conferences, workshops, journals, tracks, deadlines, reviewer expectations, paper fit, or publication positioning.
Verify one by one whether factual claims in papers, reports, or research notes are supported by the original text of specified sources, and save the claim location, source pointer, original text position, verdict, and block status. Use when the user asks for "check if the citation supports this sentence", "perform a claim-to-source audit", "verify figures, trends, or causal statements", "check claims before submission", or requests the rw-claim-audit workflow.
Review the accessibility, version, identifiers, restrictions, and statements of research data, code, and materials, and do not equate public availability with reusability. Use when the user asks for "check data availability", "write data availability statement", "check whether data, code, and materials are reusable", or requests the rw-research-data workflow. Runs without a private local workspace or preset research-lab; use user-provided material and bundled public-source methods.
Discover, verify, and document literature based on specific judgments, and adjust search directions according to evidence. Use when the user asks for "find relevant literature", "conduct literature discovery", "supplement sources for this argument", or requests the rw-literature-discovery workflow. Runs without a private local workspace or preset research-lab; use user-provided material and bundled public-source methods.
Organize research, constructs, design, samples, results, biases, conflicts, and gaps into a traceable evidence map. Use when the user asks for "create an evidence map", "organize research conflicts", "connect literature", or requests the rw-evidence-map workflow. Runs without a private local workspace or preset research-lab; use user-provided material and bundled public-source methods.
Systematic retrieval expert covering all areas of Chinese law. ## Core Features - Supports user identity recognition (ordinary person/law student/lawyer/judge/prosecutor) - Provides differentiated services based on different identities - Complete legal source retrieval (laws/administrative regulations/judicial interpretations/guiding cases/typical cases) - Original legal article citation and cross-reference sorting ## Core Trigger Conditions (Trigger if any is met) **High Priority (Must Trigger)**: - Explicit request to find legal articles/regulations/judicial interpretations/regulatory documents - Request to determine legality/illegality ("Is it illegal?""Is it legal?""Am I liable?") - Request to find compensation standards/compensation amounts/liability determination/procedural requirements - Asking "Based on which law?""What does the law stipulate?""What is the legal basis?" **Medium Priority (Trigger based on context)**: - "What to do?""How to defend rights?""Can I sue?" - "What procedures are needed?""What conditions are required?" - "What else can I claim?""Where can I file a complaint?" ## Application Scenarios - Labor disputes: illegal termination, economic compensation, work-related injuries, social security, job transfer, etc. - Contract disputes: deposit, liquidated damages, breach of contract liability, sales contracts, etc. - Tort liability: traffic accidents, personal injury, medical accidents, environmental pollution, etc. - Marriage and family: divorce property, child custody, estate inheritance, etc. - Administrative/criminal/corporate finance, etc. ## Non-Triggering Scenarios - Only asking about legal concepts/terminology explanations (not retrieval-related) - Only requesting lawyer/legal service recommendations - Only discussing legal news/case stories (not involving specific regulations) - Only asking about legal examination/study questions **Note**: Even if the user does not explicitly request a "retrieval report", this skill will be triggered as long as the issue involves searching, organizing, interpreting, or applying legal norms.
Create a new Git branch or code worktree for experiments, features, baselines, rebuttal fixes, or method revisions. Use when starting an isolated code direction, creating a branch, creating a project-aware code worktree under a project control root, or setting up a worktree with UV sync, IDE config copying, linked assets, and worktree memory.
Analyse code changes since the last docs update and refresh the project's documentation files. Use when code has changed and documentation needs to be updated, after implementing new features, or before a milestone commit.
Plan, draft, and revise ML/AI limitations, scope, failure cases, ethics, broader impact, and conclusion caveats so they control claim boundaries without undermining the paper. Use when the user wants limitation wording, scope statements, failure-case interpretation, ethics/broader-impact text, or overclaim reduction.
Codex-native Academic Research Skills suite for deep research, academic paper writing, manuscript review, full research-to-paper pipelines, and experiment planning or validation. Use when the user asks for deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, research question refinement, academic paper drafting, paper revision, citation or integrity checks, reviewer simulation, peer review, editorial decision letters, research-to-paper workflows, experiment execution planning, statistical interpretation, or human study protocol support. Also use for Claude-style ARS command aliases such as /ars-plan, ars-plan, /ars-outline, /ars-abstract, /ars-lit-review, /ars-citation-check, /ars-disclosure, /ars-format-convert, /ars-revision-coach, /ars-revision, and /ars-full. This skill vendors ARS role prompts, references, templates, and shared handoff schemas under ars/.
Use when planning, running, comparing, or recording computational experiments, benchmarks, ablations, autonomous research loops, overnight runs, training runs, or exploratory variants.