Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,226 Skills
Run Codex, Claude Code, and Gemini CLI reviews against the current branch concurrently, deduplicate the findings, and fix only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase.
Comprehensive review of local uncommitted changes using specialized agents with code improvement suggestions
arthrod's coding philosophy and dispatcher. Universal red-green TDD, stacked PRs, test-always, evidence-before-claims. Routes to conejo-code (active coding), conejo-frontend (strict UI), conejo-merge (calm PR/merge). Use when starting any coding work or deciding how to approach a task.
Use when the user wants a plan validated by @coderabbitai but the right approach is uncertain — file 2-3 parallel issues with the SAME GOAL but deliberately shuffled assumptions/layers/triggers, so CR has comparative material instead of yes/no on a single approach. Triggers on multi-assumptions, multi-framing, parallel plans, comparative plan, dangle-the-carrots.
Review code with validated evidence. Use for normal, security, performance, or deep audits of diffs, architecture, data, tests, dependencies, docs, and code health.
Use when preparing a PR for review — applies body templates, uploads visual evidence via the assets backend, and runs the self-audit checklist.
Code review of current git changes, compare to related plan if exists, identify bad engineering, over-engineering, or suboptimal solutions. Use when user asks to review changes, check git diff, validate implementation quality, or assess code changes.
Review a merge request or branch. Compares a branch against main/master, summarizes changes, highlights concerns, and provides actionable feedback. Use for PR reviews or before merging.
Bootstrap a local AI review pipeline and generate a paste-ready review prompt for any provider (Codex, Gemini, GPT, Claude, etc.). Use after creating a handoff or when ready to get an AI code review.
Use when writing, reviewing, or committing code to enforce Karpathy's 4 coding principles — surface assumptions before coding, keep it simple, make surgical changes, define verifiable goals. Triggers on "review my diff", "check complexity", "am I overcomplicating this", "karpathy check", "before I commit", or any code quality concern where the LLM might be overcoding.
Pre-processes the repository by generating security-focused summaries (mantis-summary.md) for each directory to make planning and research more efficient. Use when starting a review campaign to map the codebase before threat modeling and planning. Don't use for executing code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching code.
Use when adding metadata to commits without changing history, tracking review status, test results, code quality annotations, or supplementing commit messages post-hoc - provides git notes commands and patterns for attaching non-invasive metadata to Git objects.