Loading...
Loading...
Found 3,053 Skills
Build and deploy new Goldsky Turbo pipelines from scratch. Triggers on: 'build a pipeline', 'index X on Y chain', 'set up a pipeline', 'track transfers to postgres', or any request describing data to move from a chain/contract to a destination (postgres, clickhouse, kafka, s3, webhook). Covers the full workflow: requirements → dataset selection → YAML generation → validation → deploy. Not for debugging (use /turbo-doctor) or syntax lookups (use /turbo-pipelines).
Build high-performance APIs with Django-Bolt, including BoltAPI routes, typed request validation, msgspec serialization, auth guards, middleware, OpenAPI docs, pagination, streaming, SSE, WebSockets, and testing. Use when the user asks to create a new bolt endpoint, set up a Django-Bolt project, add JWT or API key auth, configure runbolt, wire guards or middleware, add pagination or streaming, generate OpenAPI docs, write TestClient tests, or migrate from FastAPI, Django REST Framework, or Django Ninja to django-bolt. Do NOT use for general Django views, Django admin customization, or standard Django REST Framework work.
Guidelines for building RoboCorp RPA automation with Python, emphasizing functional programming, Pydantic validation, and async operations.
Extract comprehensive, production-ready JSON design specifications from visual inputs using a 7-pass serial architecture with cross-validation. Use when converting screenshots, mockups, or design exports into structured design tokens, component specs, accessibility analysis, and developer handoff artifacts.
PHP type juggling and weak comparison (`==`) bypass. Use when authentication, HMAC/signature checks, or token validation uses loose equality, numeric coercion, or hash comparisons without strict types — common in legacy PHP and CTF-style code paths.
Official Rails documentation. Use when asked about any Rails-specific topic including ActiveRecord, routing, controllers, views, mailers, jobs, Action Cable, Action Text, Active Storage, migrations, validations, callbacks, associations, caching, security, or internals.
Apply when implementing asynchronous payment methods (Boleto, Pix, bank redirects) or working with callback URLs in payment connector code. Covers undefined status response, callbackUrl notification, X-VTEX-signature validation, sync vs async handling, and correct delayToCancel configuration for each async method.
Build a pre-implementation harness for ambiguous or risky coding tasks by grounding the request in the repository, producing a structured impact map, surfacing ambiguities and risks, defining scope boundaries, and creating a validation-ready implementation contract before any code changes are made. Use when a task is broad, underspecified, cross-cutting, or likely to drift without an explicit planning checkpoint.
Use when you need to add or review Flyway database migrations in a Spring Boot application — Maven dependencies, db/migration scripts, spring.flyway.* configuration, baseline and validation, and alignment with JDBC or Spring Data JDBC. Part of the skills-for-java project
Use when writing server-side code with Supabase — Edge Functions, Hono apps, webhook handlers, or any backend that needs Supabase auth and client creation. Trigger whenever the user imports from `@supabase/server`, mentions `supabase/server`, Supabase Edge Functions, or needs server-side auth (JWT verification, API key validation, CORS handling) with Supabase. Also trigger when you see legacy patterns in existing code — `Deno.serve`, `createClient(Deno.env.get('SUPABASE_URL'))`, imports from `esm.sh/@supabase`, `deno.land/std` serve, or usage of `SUPABASE_ANON_KEY` / `SUPABASE_SERVICE_ROLE_KEY` — these indicate code that should be migrated to this package.
Multi-framework intelligence brief. Takes any business situation, investment thesis, career decision, or strategic problem and runs it through 4-7 of 11 analytical frameworks (Feynman, Kahneman, Shannon, Tetlock, Duke, Munger, Thiel, Helmer, Christensen, Meadows, Taleb, Bezos). Each framework runs as a distinct sub-analysis producing concrete claims. Contradictions between analyses are surfaced explicitly. Synthesizes into a single brief: Core Argument, Key Insight, load-bearing conditions, failure modes with numeric probabilities, validation tests, recommended action with sizing, and the strongest dissent. Use when the user says "think through this", "analyze this for me", "help me decide", "think", "/think", or presents any complex decision, investment thesis, business question, or strategic problem that warrants structured multi-framework analysis.
Refine an existing design tree until key branches become implementation-ready. Use when the high-level structure already exists but important branches remain vague, shallow, or unresolved. Trigger when the user needs deeper decomposition, edge-case coverage, failure-path clarification, interface detail, or validation criteria for a partially designed system. Do not use to create the initial design skeleton from scratch or to compare options for a single explicit decision node.