Loading...
Loading...
Found 13,116 Skills
Evaluate solutions through multi-round debate between independent judges until consensus
Fill web forms by fetching form fields from a URL, deep-searching the user's local knowledge base for relevant info, and generating a markdown document with all answers pre-filled. Use when the user provides a URL to a web form (conference application, speaker submission, event registration, profile form) and wants help filling it out from their existing materials. Also trigger when the user mentions "填网页表", "fill web form", "网页填表", "表单填写", "申请表填写", "conference application", "speaker submission", "讲师申请", "报名表", or provides a URL with "form", "feedback", "apply", "register", "submit" in the path.
UI/UX design patterns and best practices. Pattern library + heuristic checks for shipping clean, usable interfaces.
Turn a vague idea or task into a confirmed Working Brief by interviewing the user one question at a time, each with a recommended answer, then (only when the user chooses) plan execution with cost-effective model routing. Use when the user invokes Ask Me, wants to clarify scope or requirements before work begins (เคลียร์โจทย์ วางขอบเขต ทำ brief), or asks to execute a WORKING-BRIEF.md.
Implement an approved spec or focused unambiguous task through stale-safe source edits. Use when the user wants code written — "implement this", "cook this spec", "/cook .cheese/specs/<slug>.md", or "fix this bug" when the fix is clear; also when the user just says "go" or "ship it" with a spec or clear acceptance criteria in scope. Runs standalone on an unambiguous task — a spec helps but is not required. Do NOT use for fuzzy planning (`/mold`), no-write discussion (`/culture`), or review-only work (`/age`).
Converge a fuzzy idea or half-formed feature into an approved spec through an iterative, grounded design dialogue. Use when the user has a fuzzy idea or design direction — phrases like "let's design X", "I'm thinking about Y", "what should the API for Z look like", "shape this into a spec", "what would it take to build/set up X", "I want to add a feature that…", "/mold". Use even when the user is "just thinking out loud" if they want the dialogue to leave behind a written artifact. Do NOT use for free-form discussion with no artifact intent (`/culture`), direct implementation (`/cook`), or research-only questions (`/briesearch`).
Advanced om-auto-create-pr for long, multi-step spec implementations needing resumability and strict step tracking — run folder (PLAN/HANDOFF/NOTIFY), one lean commit per Step, checkpoint verification every ~5 Steps with integration tests and UI screenshots, full gate at completion, ready labeled PR. Resumable via om-auto-continue-pr-loop. Use plain om-auto-create-pr for small fixes.
Parse, navigate, and query materials science ontology structures — browse class hierarchies, inspect individual classes and their properties, look up object and data property definitions with domain/range, search for ontology terms by keyword, and parse or summarize raw OWL/XML files. Currently supports CMSO and ASMO; the broader OCDO ecosystem (CDCO, PODO, PLDO, LDO) is planned. Use when exploring what classes or properties an ontology provides, finding the right CMSO term for a crystal structure or simulation concept, understanding parent-child class relationships, or onboarding to an unfamiliar materials ontology, even if the user only says "what ontology terms describe my FCC copper simulation" or "show me the CMSO class hierarchy."
Report local Claude, Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Grok, and Kimi quota windows via the quota-axi CLI - remaining effective usable runway, percentages, reset times, cycle-average pace vs the reset clock, and provider status read from local auth sources, with no routing, provider mutation, or default ordering preference. Use before deciding whether it is safe to keep spending a provider's quota, when the user asks about usage, rate limits, pace, or remaining quota, or when comparing local provider headroom.
Analyze job descriptions (JD), assess job matching degree, extract requirements and keywords, identify gaps, and develop application strategies. Use this when users ask "Am I a fit?", "matching degree", "analyze this JD", or prepare to tailor resumes according to JD. Only take JD as target information, never treat job requirements as the candidate's facts.
Build a panel of your real buyer personas (from a deep scan of any tools you allow it to connect to) and have them debate any decision you bring — a marketing launch, a price increase, a new product, a positioning change, a feature cut. Returns a structured debate, the strongest objections, and a clear recommendation. Use when you want your actual customers in the room before you commit.
Facilitates structured ideation sessions using proven brainstorming techniques (SCAMPER, SWOT, 5 Whys, Mind Mapping, Six Thinking Hats, Reverse Brainstorming, Starbursting, Brainwriting). Produces a brainstorming-report.md of organized ideas and actionable insights. Operates in three intents: Create (new session), Update (add techniques or deepen coverage), Validate (confirm insights align with project goals). Use when the user says: "brainstorm", "ideate", "generate ideas", "explore options", "SCAMPER", "SWOT analysis", "mind map", "Six Thinking Hats", "5 Whys", "creative session", "what if we", "let's explore", "think through possibilities", "find alternatives", or "problem-solve". This skill PLANS only — it never writes application code or runs tests.