Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,948 Skills
Estimate fair market rates for creator partnerships based on platform, follower count, engagement rate, niche, and deliverable type. This skill should be used when estimating influencer rates, calculating creator pricing, building a rate card for a campaign, checking if a creator's rate is fair, comparing influencer costs across platforms, budgeting for a creator campaign, evaluating a creator's rate card, figuring out how much to pay an influencer, benchmarking creator rates against market data, or assessing whether a creator is overcharging. For negotiating rates after estimation, see rate-negotiation-playbook. For full creator vetting beyond pricing, see creator-vetting-scorecard.
Identify, assess, and mitigate operational risks. Trigger with "what are the risks", "risk assessment", "risk register", "what could go wrong", or when the user is evaluating risks associated with a project, vendor, process, or decision.
Dependency management and auditing — evaluating new dependencies, security vulnerability scanning, update strategies, and license compliance. Use when adding or auditing dependencies.
When the user wants to design, optimize, or evaluate App Store screenshots and preview videos. Also use when the user mentions "screenshots", "app preview", "product page design", "screenshot design", "creative assets", or "what should my screenshots show". For A/B testing screenshots, see ab-test-store-listing. For full ASO audit, see aso-audit.
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims, PR review, subagent-driven review, completion verification. Actions: review, evaluate, verify, validate code changes. Keywords: code review, PR review, pull request, technical feedback, review feedback, completion claim, verification, evidence-based, code quality, review request, technical rigor, subagent review, code-reviewer, review gate, merge criteria. Use when: receiving code review feedback, completing major features, making completion claims, requesting systematic reviews, validating before merge, preventing false completion claims.
Identify the first beachhead market segment for a product launch. Evaluates segments against burning pain, willingness to pay, winnable market share, and referral potential. Use when choosing a first market, targeting an initial customer segment, or planning market entry strategy.
Runs real-time safety analysis for instructions involving destructive operations, permission changes, irreversible actions, prompt injection, or compliance-sensitive operations. Evaluates risk level, destructiveness, and reversibility via backend API. Use when asked for safety check, risk assessment, security audit, destructive check, instruction audit, or Modeio safety scan. Also use proactively before executing any instruction that deletes data, modifies permissions, drops or truncates tables, deploys to production, or alters system state irreversibly. Also supports pre-install Skill Safety Assessment for third-party skill repositories via a static prompt contract.
Proper handling of files generated during the MSBuild's build process. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. Use when generated files are not being included in compilation, output, or when globs aren't capturing generated files. Covers MSBuild evaluation vs execution phases, timing targets to include generated files, and ensuring generated files are tracked for incremental builds and clean.
Use this when you need to evaluate the risks and benefits of accepting, negotiating before accepting, pausing, or rejecting outsourcing projects, internal projects, or requirements. It is particularly suitable for scenarios with ambiguity in scope, acceptance criteria, payment terms, compliance, project timelines, or dependencies, as well as high-uncertainty situations such as emergency task insertion, contract renewal/modification, multi-requirement prioritization, or AI/LLM-related initiatives.
Guides research ideation through a 5-step goal-driven workflow: define long-term goal, build literature tree (novelty + challenge-insight), select a problem (well-established solution check), design a solution (cross-domain transfer + decomposition), validate and iterate. Also covers structured paper reading (3 depth levels). Use when: user wants to find a research direction, brainstorm ideas, build field vision, do a literature review, evaluate idea novelty, or read papers systematically. Do NOT use for comparing/ranking existing ideas (use idea-tournament) or planning a paper (use paper-planning).
Plan and execute a comprehensive red team engagement covering reconnaissance through post-exploitation using MITRE ATT&CK-aligned TTPs to evaluate an organization's detection and response capabilities.
Convert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.