Loading...
Loading...
Found 156 Skills
Use when running an annual SaaS audit, doing category-level spend review, or rationalizing the supplier base — when the user needs to do a spend audit, spend categorization (UNSPSC-aligned), purchasing-cycle analysis, or risk-balanced supplier consolidation. Triggers on "spend audit", "SaaS audit", "spend categorization", "supplier rationalization", "supplier consolidation", "purchasing cycle", "procurement review", "category strategy", "duplicate SaaS", "renewal cluster". Ships 3 stdlib-only Python tools (UNSPSC-aligned spend categorizer with Pareto breakdown and industry profiles, purchasing-cycle analyzer that surfaces bottleneck categories per Goldratt's Theory of Constraints, supplier-consolidation planner that refuses single-source recommendations for tier-1 categories without a documented break-glass plan), 3 reference docs each citing 7+ authoritative sources (A.T. Kearney / Hackett / Spend Matters / UNSPSC / Productiv / Vendr / Tropic / IACCM / ISM / BCG), and a 20-minute spend-intake template. Distinct from sibling vendor-management (performance scoring of vendors you keep paying), finance/financial-analysis (close + report, not category strategy), and c-level-advisor/general-counsel-advisor (contract law, not category rationalization).
This skill should be used when the user says phrases like "record a topic", "new topic", "how is this topic", "I have an idea", "help me note this down", or shares a rough content idea that needs evaluation and recording. Even if the user casually mentions a content idea, actively trigger the evaluation process without waiting for the user to explicitly say "record". First, use the five-dimensional logic of dbs-content to diagnose whether the topic is worth doing. Only record it if it is worth doing, and recommend 3-5 similar topics by drawing inferences. Do not trigger: Deepen the topic to generate an outline (use li-topic), directly write scripts (use li-writer), or AI polish or beautify the topic title. Use when the user wants to "record a topic", "log a topic idea", "is this topic worth doing", or shares a rough contentclaise Du.弹应用样子Pr广解除禁 \ 诊断和记录.
Analyse competitor moves and surface strategic implications for your product. Use when asked to track competitor signals, analyse a competitor announcement, understand what a competitor is doing strategically, or produce a competitive intelligence report. Produces a categorised signal analysis with threat ratings, roadmap implications, and recommended responses.
Systematic competitive analysis for product positioning, sales enablement, and strategic planning. Use when the user wants to analyze competitors, build battlecards, create comparison pages, understand market positioning, or research competitive landscape. Also triggers on: 'competitor analysis,' 'competitive landscape,' 'battlecard,' 'win/loss analysis,' 'market positioning,' 'how do we compare to,' or 'what is [company] doing.'
Use vision models to self-review screenshots against design intent. Catches spacing issues, alignment problems, color inconsistencies, responsive bugs, and accessibility gaps. Use when reviewing designs, comparing implementations to mockups, or doing pre-ship QA.
Comprehensive guide for Azure Data Explorer (ADX) and Kusto Query Language (KQL); use when writing/optimizing KQL queries, setting up ingestion, building dashboards, doing time-series/ML analysis, configuring management/security, or when users mention Kusto, KQL, ADX, Azure Data Explorer, or log analytics queries.
Use this skill to quickly understand "what changed and what matters". Use when resuming work after absence, preparing handoff documentation, reviewing sprint progress, analyzing git history for context. Do not use when doing detailed diff analysis - use diff-analysis instead. DO NOT use when: full code review needed - use review-core instead.
Set up and improve harness engineering (AGENTS.md, docs/, lint rules, eval systems, project-level prompt engineering) for AI-agent-friendly codebases. Triggers on: new/empty project setup for AI agents, AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md creation, harness engineering questions, making agents work better on a codebase. ALSO triggers when users are frustrated or complaining about agent quality — e.g. 'the agent keeps ignoring conventions', 'it never follows instructions', 'why does it keep doing X', 'the agent is broken' — because poor agent output almost always signals harness gaps, not model problems. Covers: context engineering, architectural constraints, multi-agent coordination, evaluation, long-running agent harness, and diagnosis of agent quality issues.
Run browser encrypted JS in Node.js (environment patching). env_core.js provides function disguise/prototype chain/Proxy engine, Claude writes stubs on demand in run.js according to the diagnosis report. TRIGGER when: user says "environment patching", "module extraction", "run in Node", "webpack module extraction", "environment simulation", "run JS in Node", or needs to run independently without browser after finding the encryption entry. DO NOT TRIGGER when: only debugging in browser, doing AST deobfuscation, or writing ordinary Node.js code.
Progressive Domain Crystallization (PDC) — a skill for building and maintaining a living domain knowledge base for any custom business application. Use this skill whenever the user is developing a business application and wants the AI to accumulate understanding of internal terminology, entities, relationships, and business rules over time — especially when that knowledge is not fully defined upfront and grows across sessions. Trigger on any of: "remember how our system works", "learn our domain", "track business entities", "build domain knowledge", "understand our terminology", "grow AI context over time", "domain model", "business rules documentation", or whenever a user says the AI doesn't understand their business-specific language or data model. Also use at the start of any session where a DOMAIN.md file exists in the project — always read it before doing any work.
GetMoreBacklinks platform help — managed directory submission service for startups. Use when deciding whether to pay for directory submissions vs doing it yourself, comparing GetMoreBacklinks plans (Starter $87 vs Business $187), setting expectations for DR improvement timeline, evaluating if a managed submission service is worth it for your budget, or troubleshooting why directory submissions didn't improve rankings. Do NOT use for DIY directory submission strategy (use /sales-launch-directory). Do NOT use for backlink analysis or SEO audits (use /sales-semrush).
Use when normalizing BibTeX, RIS, CSL JSON, citation keys, DOI/arXiv/PMID metadata, references, unused citations, missing citations, or bibliography quality for papers and SOTA work.