Loading...
Loading...
Found 185 Skills
Use when normalizing BibTeX, RIS, CSL JSON, citation keys, DOI/arXiv/PMID metadata, references, unused citations, missing citations, or bibliography quality for papers and SOTA work.
Use when reviewing or rebalancing direct vs. partner-led channel economics — computing fully-loaded cost-to-serve per channel, channel ROI with cash / LTV / marginal lenses, and optimal channel mix subject to constraints. For Head of Commercial, RevOps, and VP Sales doing quarterly channel review when pipeline is mixed (e.g., 60% direct + 40% partner-led) and nobody actually knows which channel makes money after CAC, support load, partner discount, deal-velocity differences, retention differential, and overhead allocation are all loaded in. Outputs cost to serve, channel ROI verdicts (DOUBLE-DOWN / MAINTAIN / DEFUND / EXIT), a sensitivity-tested channel-mix recommendation, and the diminishing-returns inflection. Not channel structure (that's partnerships-architect — tiers, joint GTM, revshare). Not RevOps process (that's business-growth/revenue-operations — lead routing, SDR motion). Not strategic CRO judgment (that's c-level-advisor/cro-advisor — comp plans, when-to-hire-a-VP-Sales). Not historical close-and-report (that's finance/financial-analysis). This skill answers: direct vs partner profitability, channel profitability, channel mix, channel economics.
Use when doing dev-stage self-review on the current branch before pushing or opening a PR — runs an auto-loop of codex review (cross-model, OpenAI) + per-finding fix + re-review until findings converge or stop conditions fire. Codex follows pr-review's multi-role methodology (security / staff-engineer / sdet / spec-auditor). Triggers — 'self review', 'self-review', '自己 review', '自我 review', 'cross-model review', 'pre-push review', 'review and fix my branch'. NOT for live PR review with sticky/inline comments (use pr-review), NOT for managed PR babysitting (use pr-babysit), NOT for first-time review without intent to fix (use mode=review-only opt-in).
Audit your biggest closed-won deals to find your PROVEN ideal customer profile, then find more accounts like them. Use whenever someone wants to analyze won deals, audit their best customers, see which companies generated the most revenue, find their real ICP, build a look-alike target list, segment customers by what actually pays, or learn which acquisition channel produced their best revenue. Triggers on: 'audit my biggest deals', 'which customers made us the most money', 'analyze my closed-won', 'what's my proven ICP', 'find more customers like my best ones', 'look-alike accounts', 'HubSpot deal analysis', 'revenue by account', 'which channel generated my best deals', 'acquisition source analysis'. For RevOps, Heads of Sales/Marketing, founders and growth leads doing ICP refinement, account-based targeting or pipeline/QBR review. Reads HubSpot via its MCP or a CSV export, then hands the profile to sales-nav-search-builder to generate the prospecting search. Maintained by La Growth Machine.
Rank outreach campaigns by real revenue impact — which campaigns actually generated deals, pipeline, or meetings — by cross-referencing the user's La Growth Machine campaign data with their CRM deal data (HubSpot today). Use whenever the user wants to know which campaigns drove pipeline, compare campaign ROI, see which campaigns to continue / stop / adapt, audit campaign impact, review attribution, asks 'which of my campaigns is actually working', or wants a campaign performance ranking by deals or revenue. Triggers on: 'which campaigns drove pipeline', 'rank my campaigns by deals', 'campaign ROI', 'campaign impact', 'which campaigns to stop', 'which to scale', 'attribution review', 'pipeline by campaign'. Pulls live data from the La Growth Machine MCP and the HubSpot MCP when connected; works from pasted exports otherwise. For RevOps, Heads of Sales/Marketing, founders and growth leads doing campaign performance reviews. Maintained by La Growth Machine.
THE workflow for picking up and carrying ONE ticket/card forward, for an autonomous worker agent or for a human doing it locally. Resolves the repo's tracker from the AFK registry (~/.claude/afk.json; GitHub Projects or Linear), picks one ticket by priority, routes by status x label (interview / human walkthrough / execute), loads LEARNINGS.md as binding constraints, implements test-first, verifies end-to-end and simplifies the diff (the /go finish), then branches to a PR for the reviewer. Use when the user says "pick up <id>", "work on issue <id>", invokes /engineer, invokes /pickup, says "pickup", or at the very start of working any card.
Decision guide for delegating to hui-style subagents. Tells the main thread WHEN to spawn `huicrew-investigator` (locate code), `huicrew-builder` (1-2 file edit), or `huicrew-reviewer` (diff review) instead of doing the work inline or using vanilla `Explore`. Subagent output is hui-compressed so the tool-result injected back into main context is ~60% smaller — main context lasts longer across long sessions. Trigger: "delegate to subagent", "use huicrew", "spawn investigator/builder/reviewer", "save context", "compressed agent output".
Écrit un court segment fictionnel immersif pour l'Acte IV d'un épisode NEW TEMPS X. Utilise ce Skill quand tu dois créer une scène fictionnelle qui illustre les implications d'un sujet scientifique, faire ressentir plutôt qu'expliquer, ou créer une résonance émotionnelle à travers la fiction.
Deep code audit that finds dead wiring, silent failures, unfinished features, placeholder stubs, bloated files, and unnecessary complexity. Produces an actionable report with file:line references grouped by severity. Think of it as a senior dev doing a thorough PR review of the entire codebase. Triggers on: "code review", "audit the code", "review the code", "find dead code", "find placeholders", "check for stubs", "prune the code", "code cleanup", "implementation review", "completeness check", "find unused code".
Analyze an influencer's recent content and return a brand safety report flagging political controversy, offensive language, sensitive topics, or past scandal indicators. This skill should be used when screening a creator for brand safety, vetting influencer content for risks, checking if a creator is brand-safe, auditing an influencer's content history for red flags, running a brand safety check on a creator, evaluating creator risk before a partnership, flagging controversial creator content, reviewing an influencer for offensive language or sensitive topics, or doing a pre-campaign safety review. For holistic creator evaluation including performance metrics, see creator-vetting-scorecard. For writing campaign briefs with content guidelines and safety clauses, see campaign-brief-generator.
AI pair programming with real-time screen and audio context. Use when the user wants to record their screen, start/stop recording, or get context from what they're doing.
Création, édition et analyse complète de tableurs avec support des formules, du formatage, de l'analyse de données et de la visualisation. Quand Claude doit travailler avec des tableurs (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv, etc.) pour : (1) Créer de nouveaux tableurs avec formules et formatage, (2) Lire ou analyser des données, (3) Modifier des tableurs existants en préservant les formules, (4) Analyse et visualisation de données dans les tableurs, ou (5) Recalculer des formules.