Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,228 Skills
Reviews axum web framework code for routing patterns, extractor usage, middleware, state management, and error handling. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses axum, tower, or hyper for HTTP services. Covers axum 0.7+ patterns including State, Path, Query, Json extractors.
Run a full Flows app platform review against a React/TypeScript CDF codebase, following the cognitedata/dune-app-reviews scoring criteria. Produces three artifacts: review-files.md (per-file inventory), review-packages.md (dependency audit), and review-report.md (scored report with must/should/nice-fix items). Use when the user asks for a Flows app review, pre-submit review, approval review, app certification review, code quality audit, CDF platform review, or "run dune-review" on a codebase before submission.
Reviews SQLAlchemy code for session management, relationships, N+1 queries, and migration patterns. Use when reviewing SQLAlchemy 2.0 code, checking session lifecycle, relationship() usage, or Alembic migrations.
Reviews CloudKit code for container setup, record handling, subscriptions, and sharing patterns. Use when reviewing code with import CloudKit, CKContainer, CKRecord, CKShare, or CKSubscription.
Skill for handling PR code reviews. Use when triggered by a PR review comment, review request, or when asked to review code changes. Provides workflow for reading review comments, understanding feedback, and iterating on changes.
Expert at quality-focused code review with security emphasis. Use when reviewing code changes, performing security audits, identifying bugs, ensuring code quality and maintainability, or analyzing pull requests for issues.
React/Next.js/TypeScript 코드의 품질, 성능, 접근성, 보안, 타입 안전성을 리뷰하는 스킬. "코드 리뷰", "code review", "리뷰해줘", "검토해줘", "PR 리뷰" 등의 요청 시 사용.
Get git records for specified users and days, perform code review for each commit, and generate detailed code review reports
This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, performing comprehensive code review, analyzing code changes before merge, or when the user asks for thorough/ultra-critical code review. Performs EXTREMELY CRITICAL 6-pass analysis identifying runtime failures, code consistency issues, architectural problems, environment compatibility risks, and verification strategies. Posts structured review as GitHub PR comment. Use when user asks to "review PR", "review this code", "review changes", "check this PR", "analyze PR", "post review", or for Phase 3 of devflow. Supports parallel review mode with multiplier (code-review-3, code-review 6X) for consensus-based reviews. This is an ultra-critical reviewer that does not let things slip and desires only perfection.
Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.
Use when requesting code review, receiving code review feedback, before merging, or when handling reviewer suggestions - covers both giving and receiving review
Load PROACTIVELY when task involves reviewing code, auditing quality, or validating implementations. Use when user says "review this code", "check this PR", "audit the codebase", or "score this implementation". Covers the 10-dimension weighted scoring rubric (correctness, security, performance, architecture, testing, error handling, type safety, maintainability, accessibility, documentation), automated pattern detection for anti-patterns, and structured review output with actionable findings.