Loading...
Loading...
Found 207 Skills
Reviews documentation PRs and provides GitHub PR suggestions. Load when asked to review, suggest changes, or provide feedback on docs content. Covers MDX, frontmatter, style guide, components, and content accuracy.
Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis
Identifies silent failures, inadequate error handling, and inappropriate fallback behavior in code. Zero tolerance for errors that occur without proper logging and user feedback. Triggers: When reviewing error handling, checking for silent failures, analyzing catch blocks. Examples: - "Review the error handling" -> audits all error handling in recent changes - "Check for silent failures" -> hunts for swallowed errors and empty catch blocks - "Analyze catch blocks in this PR" -> reviews every try-catch for adequacy - "Are there any hidden failures?" -> finds errors that get silently ignored
Use when the user asks to create a CodeTour .tour file — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs that link to real files and line numbers. Trigger for: create a tour, onboarding tour, architecture tour, PR review tour, explain how X works, vibe check, RCA tour, contributor guide, or any structured code walkthrough request.
Scans other open issues to find ones a given PR may also fix or accidentally break. Outputs adjacent-fix opportunities and contradiction risks with file:line evidence. Use when reviewing a PR to discover bundling opportunities or downstream impact across the issue queue.
Review and fix PR review bot findings on current PR, loop until resolved. Fetches unanswered bot comments, evaluates each finding, fixes real bugs, dismisses false positives, and replies to every comment with the outcome.
Audit codebases with full recognition and PR review for uncommitted changes. Detects SEO issues, technical problems, security vulnerabilities, accessibility issues, performance bottlenecks, and more. Supports Normal, Strict, and Expert modes with Complete Audit or PR Review options.
Perform a code review with linting, standards checking, and priority-ranked findings
Standardized output format for code reviews with severity labels, file:line references, and fix code snippets. Use when generating review reports that need consistent, actionable feedback structure.
Guides Android code reviews with type-specific checklists and MVVM/Compose pattern validation. Use when reviewing Android PRs, pull requests, diffs, or local changes involving Kotlin, ViewModel, Composable, Repository, or Gradle files. Triggered by "review PR", "review changes", "check this code", "Android review", or code review requests mentioning bitwarden/android. Loads specialized checklists for feature additions, bug fixes, UI refinements, refactoring, dependency updates, and infrastructure changes.
Review code through hostile perspectives to find bugs, security issues, and unintended consequences the author missed. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing codebases, or before critical deployments.
Interactive Code Review: Inspect architecture, code quality, testing, and performance section by section. Can review git diff, specified files, or entire PRs. Trigger words: /code-review, review code, code review, code review