Loading...
Loading...
Found 7,622 Skills
Use when the agent wants to define, list, inspect, or execute GUI macros via the OpenClaw Macro System CLI. Macros are parameterized, CLI-callable workflows — the agent invokes `macro run <name>` and the system handles backend routing (plugin, file transform, accessibility, compiled GUI replay).
ChMeetings integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with ChMeetings data.
Interactive CLI for Uni-Mol molecular property prediction training and inference workflows.
Jack Henry integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Jack Henry data.
Phase 3 of the feature workflow – Complete the acceptance closed loop. Two tasks: First, check layer by layer against {slug}-design.md to verify if the implementation deviates from the plan; if deviations are found, fix them immediately instead of just "noting them down" in the report. Second, integrate this feature into the project's overall architecture documentation. Finally, produce a {slug}-acceptance.md as the closed-loop proof for the entire workflow. Predecessor dependency easysdd-feature-implement must be completed. Trigger scenarios: User says "The feature is done, let's accept it", "Do the final check", "Prepare for merge", "Generate the acceptance report".
Ultra-lightweight channel for refactor processes - used when changes are obviously too small to justify the full scan → design → apply three-stage workflow. AI directly identifies 1-3 low-risk optimization points, confirms with the user once, modifies in-place using classic methods, and validates itself by running tests. No scan checklist, no design documentation, no multi-step HUMAN verification required. Trigger scenarios: When the user says "quick refactor", "small refactor", "simply optimize XX function", "modify directly", "skip all those steps", and the scope of changes is clearly limited to a single function/single component, with tests available for self-validation.
Reliable end-to-end engineering workflow for debugging, root-cause analysis, minimal patching, and verification in production codebases. Use when Codex needs to investigate a failure systematically, trace execution, test hypotheses, implement a correct fix, validate the resolution, and check for regressions before declaring the task complete.
Run the Ouroboros specification-first development loop: reduce ambiguity with a Socratic interview, freeze an immutable seed/spec, execute against that contract, verify before claiming success, and keep looping until completion is actually verified. Use when the user wants spec-first clarification, immutable requirements, drift-aware implementation, or a persistent completion loop that should keep going until tests / checks / acceptance criteria pass. Triggers on: ooo, ouroboros, interview, seed, run workflow, evaluate, evolve, ooo ralph, specification first, socratic interview, ambiguity reduction, persistent completion.
Scan a Cargo workspace or package monorepo and refresh per-member `CLAUDE.md` files plus a thin root `CLAUDE.md`. User-only maintenance workflow for keeping workspace-local AI context accurate after refactors, member additions, export changes, or major architectural shifts.
Choose before `admin` when the user needs **Shopify CLI** to run or fix something now: validate app or extension config on disk (`shopify.app.toml`, `shopify.app.<name>.toml`, `shopify.extension.toml`) with **`shopify app config validate --json`** (not Admin GraphQL; MCP has no TOML validator); run or troubleshoot store workflows (`shopify store auth`, `shopify store execute`); inventory or product changes by handle, SKU, or location name; or CLI setup, auth, upgrade issues. Emphasize **commands and operational steps**, not only authoring GraphQL. Skip for API-only understanding or codegen with no CLI execution. Examples: validate before deploy; run an existing query via CLI; list products; missing `shopify store execute`.
Phase 1 of the feature workflow — Draft a design document for the new feature, serving as the sole input for subsequent implementation and acceptance. First gather evidence (read architecture docs, review relevant code, grep to prevent term conflicts, check archives), then write a complete first draft in one go (including YAML frontmatter + three-tier structure + test design), submit it to the user for overall review, and iterate until approval. After approval, extract {slug}-checklist.yaml from {slug}-design.md for use in the next two phases. Trigger scenarios: "Start designing the solution", "Write design doc", "Prepare to implement XX", with the prerequisite that you already know what to do, who it's for, and how to define success.
Phase 3 of the feature workflow – Complete the acceptance closed-loop. Four tasks: 1. Check layer by layer against {slug}-design.md to verify if the implementation deviates from the plan; fix any deviations on the spot instead of just "noting them" in the report. 2. Incorporate this feature into the project's overall architecture documentation. 3. If this feature changes the user story or boundaries of the corresponding requirement, update the requirement doc accordingly. 4. If this feature originated from a roadmap item, change the status of the corresponding entry in roadmap items.yaml to done and sync it with the main document. Finally, produce a {slug}-acceptance.md as the closed-loop proof for the entire workflow. Prerequisite: cs-feat-impl is completed. Trigger scenarios: User says "The feature is done, let's accept it", "Do the final check", "Prepare for merge", "Generate the acceptance report".