Loading...
Loading...
Found 145 Skills
Analyze sleep data, identify sleep patterns, evaluate sleep quality, and provide personalized sleep improvement recommendations. Supports correlation analysis with other health data.
Use when running /ltk:sync-submodules, updating submodules, or needing to "sync", "merge", "adapt", "learn from" other Claude Code plugins or repos
Apply effective software quality consultancy practices. Use when consulting, advising clients, or establishing consultancy workflows.
Use this skill when categorizing code review findings into severity levels. Apply when determining which emoji and label to use for PR comments, deciding if an issue should be flagged at all, or classifying findings as CRITICAL, IMPORTANT, DEBT, SUGGESTED, or QUESTION.
Review test quality and audit test coverage for any module. This skill should be used when reviewing existing tests, auditing test gaps, writing new tests, or when asked to assess test health. It pipelines testing standards into the audit workflow to produce a prioritized gap report. The output is a report, not code — do not write test implementations until the report is reviewed.
Quality review of test files and manual evidence documents. Goes beyond existence checks — evaluates assertion coverage, edge case handling, naming conventions, and evidence completeness. Produces ADEQUATE/INCOMPLETE/MISSING verdict per story. Run before QA sign-off or on demand.
Pre-consultation diagnostic questionnaire for clients building websites with AI tools (Claude, Codex, Cursor, Bolt, v0, etc.) who have concerns about quality, design, or maintainability. Collects structured answers about their project, tools, pain points, and goals, then generates a consultation brief. Use when preparing for a website review consultation, when a client asks for a site audit, or when someone says their AI-built site has problems. Supports Russian and English — asks the client to choose language first.
Analyze an unfamiliar repository and explain what it does, how it runs, what architectural choices define it, where the important code lives, and what deserves deeper inspection next. Use this whenever a user has just cloned a repo, wants onboarding help, asks for a repo walkthrough, or needs a reliable first-pass architecture analysis.
Review Chinese-to-English translations for accuracy, grammar, terminology, and consistency. Produces a structured review report with prioritized issues. Trigger when: user provides a Chinese document and its English translation for review/checking/proofreading, or mentions "翻译检查", "翻译审校", "translation review", "translation check", "proofread translation".
Reflect on previus response and output, based on Self-refinement framework for iterative improvement with complexity triage and verification
Code review of current git changes, compare to related plan if exists, identify bad engineering, over-engineering, or suboptimal solutions. Use when user asks to review changes, check git diff, validate implementation quality, or assess code changes.
Comprehensive multi-perspective review using specialized judges with debate and consensus building