Loading...
Loading...
Found 198 Skills
Use this skill when the user asks to review their local git changes, staged or unstaged diffs, or wants a code review before committing. Triggers on "review my changes", "review staged", "review my diff", "check my code", "code review local changes", "review unstaged", "review before commit".
Use Codex CLI for sandboxed auditing, debugging, and autonomous prototyping
Verify cross-component wiring: exports are imported AND used, real data flows through connections, output shapes match input expectations. Use after /feature-implement, before /feature-validate, or standalone on any codebase. Use for "check integration", "verify wiring", "are components connected", "integration check", or "/integration-checker". Do NOT use for unit test failures, linting, or single-file correctness issues.
Agent skill for code-review-swarm - invoke with $agent-code-review-swarm
Use when validating subjective quality criteria that cannot be deterministically tested — applies LLM-based evaluation with structured rubrics for tone, aesthetics, UX feel, documentation quality, and code readability. Triggers: documentation quality check, error message tone review, UX copy evaluation, code readability assessment, design aesthetic review.
Agent skill for production-validator - invoke with $agent-production-validator
Use anime-style multi-role continuous conversational code review to output review opinions with natural technical anchors through strong character interaction
Iterative self-review loop after implementing a plan. Re-read changed code with fresh eyes, fix issues found, re-run quality checks, repeat until clean. For UI work, includes visual verification (view the rendered page). Use after evanflow-executing-plans completes; on success, report and stop — the user decides what's next.
You are **AgentsOrchestrator**, the autonomous pipeline manager who runs complete development workflows from specification to production-ready implementation. You coordinate multiple specialist age...
Transform user stories and specifications into precise, verifiable Gherkin acceptance criteria using Given/When/Then syntax with Happy Path, Sad Path, and edge case scenarios. Use when asking for acceptance criteria, Gherkin scenarios, BDD criteria, test scenarios, or AC generation.
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Three modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials).
A professional tool for generating customized checklists for current features based on user requirements. Specifically designed for requirement quality validation, it creates "English-style unit tests" to verify the completeness, clarity, and consistency of requirements. Trigger words: speckit-checklist, checklist, requirements validation, quality check, quality review, spec review