Loading...
Loading...
Found 3,155 Skills
SPARC development workflow: Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion. A structured approach for complex implementations that ensures thorough planning before coding. Use when: new feature implementation, complex implementations, architectural changes, system redesign, integration work, unclear requirements. Skip when: simple bug fixes, documentation updates, configuration changes, well-defined small tasks, routine maintenance.
Guide for implementing Shell-based navigation in .NET MAUI apps. Covers AppShell setup, visual hierarchy (FlyoutItem, TabBar, Tab, ShellContent), URI-based navigation with GoToAsync, route registration, query parameters, back navigation, flyout and tab configuration, navigation events, and navigation guards. Use when: setting up Shell navigation, adding tabs or flyout menus, navigating between pages with GoToAsync, passing parameters between pages, registering routes, customizing back button behavior, or guarding navigation with confirmation dialogs. Do not use for: deep linking from external URLs (see .NET MAUI deep linking documentation), data binding on pages (use maui-data-binding), dependency injection setup (use maui-dependency-injection), or NavigationPage-only apps that don't use Shell.
Execute a lightweight ad-hoc task (debugging, documentation, small adjustments) without the full change lifecycle. Assesses spec impact afterward.
Conduct a systematic literature review following the PRISMA framework with explicit search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessment, and transparent synthesis. Use this skill when the user needs to design a reproducible literature search, apply PRISMA flow documentation, develop inclusion and exclusion criteria, assess study quality, or when they ask 'how do I do a systematic review', 'what is PRISMA', or 'how do I make my literature review reproducible'.
Catlass Operator End-to-End Development Orchestrator. Based on ascend-kernel (csrc/ops), it connects catlass design, catlass-operator-code-gen and ascendc sub-skills to complete the closed loop from project initialization to documentation, precision, and performance. Keywords: Catlass, end-to-end, ascend-kernel, operator development, workflow orchestration.
Umbrella skill for agent work discipline across development, analysis, and documentation: inspect the repo before restructuring, keep durable truth in repo artifacts instead of chat memory, co-evolve specs/design/steering/user docs with code, apply sound coding patterns, verify work honestly, avoid shortcuts, work efficiently with subagents without hallucinating, and keep moving through the next concrete work item when the human is away. References cover coding patterns, AI-authored code review, and artifact co-evolution. Trigger when the user asks for workflow discipline, coding patterns, doc/artifact maintenance, code review of AI-authored code, project hygiene, execution guardrails, repo normalization, or when a task risks drifting across architecture, storage, specs, continuity, or tooling boundaries.
Expert Mermaid diagram creation, validation, and rendering with dual-engine output (SVG/PNG/ASCII). Supports all 20+ diagram types including C4 architecture, AWS architecture-beta with service icons, flowcharts, sequence, ERD, state, class, mindmap, timeline, git graph, sankey, and more. Features code-to-diagram analysis, batch rendering, 15+ themes, and syntax validation. Use when users ask to create diagrams, visualize architecture, render mermaid files, generate ASCII diagrams, document system flows, model databases, draw AWS infrastructure, analyze code structure, or anything involving "mermaid", "diagram", "flowchart", "architecture diagram", "sequence diagram", "ERD", "C4", "ASCII diagram". Do NOT use for non-Mermaid image generation, data plotting with chart libraries, or general documentation writing.
Ultra-lightweight channel for refactor processes - used when changes are obviously too small to justify the full scan → design → apply three-stage workflow. AI directly identifies 1-3 low-risk optimization points, confirms with the user once, modifies in-place using classic methods, and validates itself by running tests. No scan checklist, no design documentation, no multi-step HUMAN verification required. Trigger scenarios: When the user says "quick refactor", "small refactor", "simply optimize XX function", "modify directly", "skip all those steps", and the scope of changes is clearly limited to a single function/single component, with tests available for self-validation.
Analyze broker-dealer recommendations under SEC Regulation Best Interest's four obligations: Disclosure, Care, Conflict of Interest, and Compliance. Use when the user asks whether a recommendation satisfies Reg BI, what triggers the 'recommendation' standard, how to evaluate reasonably available alternatives, rollover recommendation compliance, dual-registrant capacity disclosure, share class or account type recommendations, or Reg BI examination preparation. Also trigger when users mention 'best interest standard for brokers', 'is this a Reg BI recommendation', 'care obligation documentation', 'sales contest elimination requirement', 'Form CRS delivery', or ask how Reg BI differs from suitability or fiduciary duty.
This skill should be used when the user asks to draft or structure STR reports, suspicious transaction reports, SAR, suspicious activity reports, draft STR, STR narrative, file suspicious activity, AML STR, goAML, FinCEN SAR, suspicion narrative, or MLRO report. Guides jurisdiction-agnostic STR/SAR drafting—narrative structure (who, what, when, where, why suspicious), red flags and typologies, transaction aggregation and chronology, subject identification fields, supporting documentation checklists, quality review before filing, and escalation to MLRO/compliance—not TM rule building (aml-compliance), full LE case management, legal filing duty determination (commercial-counsel), or deep blockchain tracing (blockint skills). Complements aml-compliance, aml-cft, auditor, compliance-engineer, and commercial-counsel.
Guides organizational and business storytelling—narrative structure (setup, tension, resolution), audience-tailored stories for executives, customers, boards, and teams, honest data and metrics framing, product and strategy narratives, incident and postmortem storytelling, and actuarial or insurance risk narratives for non-technical audiences. Covers story spine, key messages, and visual or slide narrative outlines. Use when the user says "tell the story", "storytelling", "narrative for executives", "data story", "board presentation narrative", "explain with a story", "story arc", "key message", "compelling narrative", "pitch story", or "incident story"—not cross-department reframing only (cross-department-translation), company-wide comms cadence and crisis wording packs (communication-lead), long-form creative fiction or screenwriting, brand copy without strategy context, or technical documentation and API reference (tech-writer-researcher).
Use when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being worked, and quantify the gap between processing time and total elapsed time. Pairs Lean / Six Sigma / Theory-of-Constraints canon with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a process map, a ranked bottleneck list (with severity + root-cause hypothesis), and a cycle-time analysis (P50, P90, value-add ratio, Little's-Law throughput). Distinct from sales-pipeline, system-reliability (SLO), and strategic-OKR work — this is tactical process documentation for internal operations.