Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,546 Skills
Pick the right Lightning Base Component (`lightning-*`) for a given UI task, retrieve its full API (props, methods, events, slots) from the bundled per-component reference, and wire it into an LWC (LWC `.html`, `.js`, and `.css` files) without breaking SLDS. Use this skill when users say "I need a Lightning modal / datatable / combobox / record form", ask which `lightning-*` component fits a use case, want a shortlist of LBC candidates, are about to hand-roll a UI that a base component already provides, or are editing an LWC bundle's `.html` / `.js` / `.css` and need to select or wire a base component. Also triggers on "Lightning base component", "LBC", "lightning-combobox", "lightning-datatable", "use `lightning-` tag". DO NOT TRIGGER for applying SLDS design tokens, blueprints, or styling guidance in general — that is `design-systems-slds-apply`; this skill only selects and wires `lightning-*` base components.
Use when creating or editing skills, before deployment, to verify they work under pressure and resist rationalization - applies RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to process documentation by running baseline without skill, writing to address failures, iterating to close loopholes
Audit an existing product surface against its own design evidence, identify verified UI problems, and write self-contained implementation plans for another agent. Strictly read-only on product source. Use when asked to review, refine, improve, or clean up an interface without replacing its identity; investigate design-system drift; or prepare a design handoff.
Dependency health report for .NET solutions: outdated NuGet packages, vulnerable versions, and commercial-license traps (MediatR, MassTransit, FluentAssertions, AutoMapper) — powered by the get_nuget_packages MCP tool. Invoke when: "outdated packages", "check dependencies", "stale packages", "package audit", "dependency health", "are my packages up to date", "license check", "vulnerable packages", "nuget audit".
Analyzes codebase against standards and generates refactoring tasks for ring:dev-cycle.
Gate 2 sub-skill - validates uncertain mappings from Gate 1 and confirms all field specifications through testing.
Development cycle validation gate (Gate 5) - validates all acceptance criteria are met and requires explicit user approval before completion.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "respect prefers-reduced-motion", "honor reduced motion", "make my animations accessible", "fix vestibular / motion-sickness issues", "add a useReducedMotion hook", "gate GSAP / Framer Motion / Lenis for reduced motion", or "meet WCAG 2.3.3 / C39". Provides tiered (not all-or-nothing) reduced-motion patterns in CSS and JS.
Code-reviews Pluggy API integrations against Pluggy's official documentation (queried in real time via the Pluggy MCP, with a web fallback to docs.pluggy.ai when the MCP isn't connected) and returns a diagnostic report (✅/❌/⚠️) with file, line, and the code fix for each issue. Use WHENEVER the dev uploads integration files and asks to review, analyze, diagnose, or validate their Pluggy integration — or says things like "review my integration", "check my Pluggy code", "is this ready for production?", "Pluggy Doctor", "check my webhooks", "is my integration secure?", or the Portuguese variants "analisa minha integração", "revisa meu código da Pluggy", "tá tudo certo pra ir pra produção?", "checa meus webhooks", "minha integração tá segura?". Also trigger when the dev pastes/uploads code that clearly calls the Pluggy API (connect_token, GET /items, item/created webhooks, clientUserId, etc.) and wants to know if it's correct, even without saying "Pluggy Doctor". This skill is for REVIEWING existing code, not writing an integration from scratch.
Three-axis review of a diff against a fixed point: Standards (does it follow this repo's coding standards?), Spec (does it match the originating issue/PRD?), and Stability (were the spec's property-based tests shipped?). Runs axes as parallel sub-agents.