Loading...
Loading...
Found 165 Skills
Use when a user asks for CEO review, founder-mode review, think bigger, strategy review, rethink this plan, is this ambitious enough, or critique of an existing product, strategy, roadmap, or implementation plan.
Technical Research Expert Skill, providing systematic technical research methodologies, document specifications, and best practices. Trigger this skill when you need to conduct technology selection, architecture research, framework comparison, or implementation scheme research.
Know the boundaries of your expertise and operate within them. Use when evaluating opportunities, making decisions outside your domain, or assessing when to defer to experts.
Root-cause-driven solution decision framework for the hardest problems across any domain. This is the nuclear option — it consumes significant tokens through exhaustive multi-branch root cause analysis, MECE solution enumeration, and domain-adaptive external validation. Use ONLY for genuinely difficult problems: recurring failures that resist repeated fix attempts, complex systemic issues with no clear solution path, decisions where multiple approaches exist and the wrong choice has high cost, problems with multiple interacting causes spanning components or teams. Trigger when: the user says 'what's the best way to fix X', 'why does this keep happening', 'how should we approach this', 'find the root cause', 'what are my options for fixing X', 'analyze this problem systematically', 'evaluate our options for X', 'what's the right approach and why', or expresses frustration that previous solutions didn't stick. Do NOT use for: problems where the answer is already obvious or requires no analysis, straightforward issues with clear solutions, or routine investigation. If the problem can be solved in 5 minutes of investigation, this skill is overkill.
Activate this when users need to understand extreme events (bubbles, crashes, mass hysteria, cults, mob behavior), diagnose systemic organizational failures, or assess the risk of multiple psychological/market/institutional forces aligning in the same direction. Typical trigger signals: the phenomenon described by the user "far exceeds what any single factor can explain"; the user attempts to explain an extreme outcome with a single cause; the user is concerned about "multiple adverse factors erupting simultaneously". Not applicable to conventional single-factor decision analysis or assessment of mild incremental changes.
Guidance for asking clarifying questions when user requests are ambiguous, have multiple valid approaches, or require critical decisions. Use when implementation choices exist that could significantly affect outcomes.
Apply first principles thinking to break problems down to fundamental truths and reason up from there. Use this skill when the user is stuck in conventional thinking, needs to challenge assumptions, find breakthrough solutions, or evaluate whether something is truly impossible vs just assumed to be — even if they say 'everyone does it this way', 'is there a fundamentally better approach', 'why does it have to cost this much', or 'challenge my assumptions'.
Draft a structured decision memo for Ane. Use when the user asks for a "decision memo", "decision doc", "options paper", "recommendation brief", or equivalent. Produces a scannable document with context, options, recommendation, risks, and reversibility. Applies Ane's CLAUDE.md writing style automatically.
Interview the user relentlessly to expand context and surface intent, constraints, hidden assumptions, and unstated alternatives. Use whenever the user invokes `/grill-me`, says "grill me", "interview me", "pressure-test this", "help me think through", or whenever the user's first message is more decision than task — across coding, business, marketing, personal branding, SOPs, systems thinking, process design, and tough decisions.
Apply when tempted to ask 'should I do X?' on reversible work. Proceed, present the result, let the human course-correct after the fact; reserve confirmation for irreversible actions.
Generate exactly 5 probability-weighted options for a specific decision point. Forces unconventional alternatives beyond safe defaults. For quick decision-point analysis, NOT full design exploration (use brainstorming for that). Triggers on "대안", "alternatives", "옵션 뽑아", "options", "어떤 방법이", "아이디어", "다른 방법", "선택지".
Use when an agent reports a discovered task via Nexus, to review, approve as official task, reject, or escalate to idea