Loading...
Loading...
Found 202 Skills
Use when creating or iterating on a detailed per-subsystem technical design specification from a system spec, before starting OpenSpec workflow. Triggers: "design spec", "subsystem spec", "write the spec for S1", "phase breakdown", "implementation phases", "mid-level spec", "technical design". Encodes opinionated progressive phase discipline with FP progression and contract boundaries. Do NOT use for high-level system specs (use brainstorming) or for OpenSpec artifacts (use openspec directly).
Software architecture and UI/UX principles for building genuinely new solutions, not derivative work. Use when designing features, architecting software, brainstorming apps, reviewing designs, or during strategy discussions. Focuses on first-principles thinking, simplicity where it matters, and creating rather than commenting.
Comet Preset Path: Bug fix / Hotfix. Skip brainstorming, go directly through open → build → verify → archive. Applicable for behavior fixes and scenarios that do not involve new capability design.
Decompose the unified docs/specs/ artifact into parallelizable tasks — the ## Decomposition section of the same document whose ## Design & Rationale section holds the DR-N source. Triggers: 'plan implementation', 'create tasks from spec', or /plan. Applies the verification ladder: verification depth matches each task's blast radius — static analysis for low-risk tasks, scoped tests plus a kill-probe for medium, the integration suite on top for high-risk surfaces (judged test-after, not test-first ordering). Auto-chained from /ideate, or run directly to author the whole unified spec at thin/standard depth. Do NOT use for brainstorming, debugging, or code review.
Orchestrates multi-advisor council debates on high-impact architecture, technology, or product decisions. Dispatches 3-5 domain archetype subagents (pragmatic-engineer, architect-advisor, security-advocate, product-mind, devils-advocate, the-thinker) through opening statements, tensions, position evolution, and synthesis phases. Preserves dissent and delivers actionable recommendations with captured risks. Use when evaluating trade-offs, stress-testing a PRD or tech spec, resolving dilemmas with multiple viable options, or when a decision needs diverse expert perspectives. Don't use for simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, creative brainstorming without tradeoffs, or tasks where a single expert perspective suffices.
Convert evidence gaps, conflicts, and anomalies into traceable candidate innovation points, and screen them based on contribution, feasibility, and falsifiability criteria. Use when the user asks for "finding research innovation points", "generating research directions from literature gaps", "screening candidate innovation points", "brainstorming research directions", or requests the rw-research-novelty workflow. Runs without a private local workspace or preset research-lab; use user-provided material and bundled public-source methods.
Stepwise scaffolding, brainstorming, and draft-generation for literary novels using interactive interviews. TRIGGERS - Use this skill when user says: - "create a novel project" / "start a new novel" - "help me brainstorm my novel" / "plan my story" - "/novel-architect [language] novel named [name] [core idea]" - "set up novel structure" / "initialize my book project" - Any request about creating fiction writing projects or story planning Creates full novel directory with foundation files, character sheets, and chapter scaffolding. Uses gentle, reflective interview process to discover emotional truth before structure.
Use when starting any implementation task, feature request, bug fix, or refactoring work. Triggers on /plan command, before any code is written, when requirements need structured analysis, or when transitioning from brainstorming to implementation. Forces question-asking, approach comparison, and explicit approval before any code.
An official AI mind map generator developed by ProcessOn, focusing on converting content such as natural language, Markdown, long text, documents, web pages, and image text into professional, clear-structured, well-layered, and editable mind maps with one click. Whether it's article summarization, data organization, document decomposition, knowledge point induction, learning path sorting, or reading notes, paper literature sorting, meeting minutes extraction, work report summary, outline generation, project task decomposition, brainstorming and idea generation, this skill can quickly generate professional mind maps to help users transform scattered content into clear structured knowledge. This skill supports 7 professional graphic layouts including mind maps, logic diagrams, organizational charts, fishbone diagrams, timelines, tree diagrams, and table diagrams, and is deeply integrated with the ProcessOn online collaboration platform. The generated mind maps can be edited online, collaboratively modified, and efficiently reused, suitable for scenarios such as office work, study review, scientific research reading, knowledge management, and scheme planning. Note: This skill is mainly used to generate mind maps and knowledge structure brain maps, and is not applicable to the generation of process or technical charts such as flowcharts, swimlane diagrams, sequence diagrams, system architecture diagrams, ER diagrams, and Mermaid diagrams.
Generate exactly 5 probability-weighted options for a specific decision point. Forces unconventional alternatives beyond safe defaults. For quick decision-point analysis, NOT full design exploration (use brainstorming for that). Triggers on "대안", "alternatives", "옵션 뽑아", "options", "어떤 방법이", "아이디어", "다른 방법", "선택지".
Marc Andreessen-mode decision and productivity skill. A blunt, market-first operator that pressure-tests ideas, ventures, features, and career bets through Andreessen's actual frameworks — market dominates team and product; the only milestone that matters is product/market fit; bias to build over deliberate. Use when the user says 'andreessen', 'pmarca mode', 'should I build this', 'is there a market', 'are we at product/market fit', 'pmf check', 'pressure-test this idea', 'be brutal about this venture', 'market-first take', or wants a no-disclaimers, no-hedging, confidence-leveled verdict on whether something is worth pursuing. Also provides the 3x5-card + Anti-Todo personal productivity routine. Runs on a fixed anti-sycophancy operating prompt: leads with the strongest counterargument, never validates premises, uses explicit confidence levels, never apologizes for disagreeing. Not for polite brainstorming — this skill exists to tell you the market is dead when it is.
Adversarially stress-test a plan or design until every load-bearing assumption is defended or the plan is rejected. Use when the user wants to be grilled, pressure-tested, or "grill-me-thermonuclear". NOT for generative brainstorming, affirmation, light polish, or executing an already-settled plan.