Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,229 Skills
Guides technical evaluation of code review feedback before implementation. Use when receiving PR comments, review suggestions, GitHub feedback, or when asked to address reviewer feedback. Emphasizes verification and reasoned pushback over blind agreement.
Perform blunt, high-intensity code review in Ukrainian with a colloquial style inspired by Oleksandr Povoroznyuk. Use when users explicitly ask for a harsh/rough tone, slang-heavy feedback, or review comments "in style of Поворознюк", including optional profanity. Keep findings technically precise, actionable, and evidence-based.
프로젝트 컨텍스트를 파악한 뒤 전문가 관점으로 코드 리뷰하고, 사용자 승인 후 Agent Team SPAWN으로 병렬 개선 작업을 수행합니다. 트리거: 코드리뷰, 코드 리뷰, code review, 리뷰해줘, 리팩토링, 코드검토, PR 리뷰, 변경사항 검토.
Review React/TypeScript code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md workflow compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, GPU-accelerated animations, WCAG AA accessibility, bundle size limits, and surgical simplicity. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.
Use this when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially when feedback seems unclear or technically problematic - requires technical rigor and verification, not protocol execution or blind implementation
Senior code review pass. Use PROACTIVELY as the FINAL task after code changes. Reviews against project rules, fixes issues, runs quality gates. Focuses on logic and architecture while delegating style to automation.
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims, PR review, subagent-driven review, completion verification. Actions: review, evaluate, verify, validate code changes. Keywords: code review, PR review, pull request, technical feedback, review feedback, completion claim, verification, evidence-based, code quality, review request, technical rigor, subagent review, code-reviewer, review gate, merge criteria. Use when: receiving code review feedback, completing major features, making completion claims, requesting systematic reviews, validating before merge, preventing false completion claims.
Assesses and responds to incoming code review feedback on PRs (reviewer comments, requested changes), especially when suggestions are unclear, technically questionable, or scope-expanding. Use before implementing review suggestions to align on intent and keep changes minimal.
Review changes for regressions, contract mismatches, quality gaps, and missing validation evidence.
Automate code review remediation loops with the codex CLI. Requests reviews from codex, classifies findings by severity (P0-P4), fixes critical issues (P0/P1) through iterative cycles, defers quality improvements to backlog, and escalates after 3 review cycles. Use when working with code that needs structured remediation: 'codex review' in a request triggers this workflow.
Use when checking code for functional correctness, backwards compatibility, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, or missing test coverage — not style.
Provides comprehensive code review guidance for React 19, Vue 3, Angular 17+, Svelte 5, Rust, TypeScript, Java, Python, Django, Go, C#/.NET, Kotlin, NestJS, C/C++, and more. Helps catch bugs, improve code quality, and give constructive feedback. Use when: reviewing pull requests, conducting PR reviews, code review, reviewing code changes, establishing review standards, mentoring developers, architecture reviews, security audits, checking code quality, finding bugs, giving feedback on code.