Loading...
Loading...
Found 229 Skills
Search through a personal material library with over 1800 real experiences and perspectives to add a human touch to content. Use this when users mention "personal experience", "real cases", "materials", or "human touch".
Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes /cs:board, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question.
Exploratory discussion pattern for unsolved problems. Replicate the thinking of Staff+ engineers: "When there's no clear answer, expose blind spots by confronting diverse perspectives." True multi-agent discussions where experts directly engage with each other through team-based + messaging architecture.
Generate game-ready sprites for the Claude Office Visualizer using Nano Banana MCP and ImageMagick. Uses 45-degree front/top-down perspective (NOT isometric) with retro 16-bit pixel art style. Includes validation step before processing and helper scripts for background removal.
Legal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
Multi-AI orchestration primitive. Delegate to specialized AI tools, collect outputs, synthesize. Use when: analysis, review, audit, investigation tasks need multiple expert perspectives. Keywords: orchestrate, delegate, multi-ai, parallel, synthesis, consensus, dag, swarm
Apply 25 professional mental models to solve complex problems. Use when: (1) facing multi-faceted challenges that require diverse perspectives, (2) stuck in single-minded approaches, (3) need innovative solutions, (4) making major decisions with multiple stakeholders, (5) understanding complex human behavior, or (6) seeking to break cognitive biases and adopt alternative viewpoints.
Comprehensive multi-omics disease characterization integrating genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, pathway, and therapeutic layers for systems-level understanding. Produces a detailed multi-omics report with quantitative confidence scoring (0-100), cross-layer gene concordance analysis, biomarker candidates, therapeutic opportunities, and mechanistic hypotheses. Uses 80+ ToolUniverse tools across 8 analysis layers. Use when users ask about disease mechanisms, multi-omics analysis, systems biology of disease, biomarker discovery, or therapeutic target identification from a disease perspective.
Comprehensive multi-perspective review using specialized judges with debate and consensus building
Evaluate Figma designs from operator persona perspectives through design critique and user experience evaluation. Use when reviewing UX for specific user roles (e.g., air-surveillance-tech, weapons-director), conducting design reviews, or evaluating operator interfaces. Analyzes cognitive load, communication patterns, pain points, and system visibility. Works with Figma MCP (desktop/URL) and Outline docs.
Confidence scoring overlay for multi-brain decisions. Each perspective rates its own confidence (1-10) with justification. Consensus uses scores as weights, flags low-confidence areas, and surfaces uncertainty explicitly.
Two-round debate protocol where perspectives challenge each other before consensus. Round 1 presents independent positions, Round 2 allows counter-arguments and rebuttals. Produces battle-tested decisions for high-stakes choices.