Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,913 Skills
Annie Duke's Decision Quality framework applied to a business decision. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Resulting Auditor, Calibrator, Pre-Mortem Analyst, Quit Strategist, Process Architect — who each apply a distinct lens from Duke's framework to evaluate whether a decision is sound regardless of outcome. The lead synthesizes into a stacking analysis: which biases are operating, which process flaws exist, and the honest Duke verdict. Use when the user says "duke this", "is this a good bet", "should I quit", "evaluate this decision", or faces any high-stakes choice under uncertainty and wants rigorous decision-process analysis. Works as a standalone analysis or after /office-hours.
[production-grade internal] Audits and implements web/mobile accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA compliance, screen reader support, keyboard navigation, color contrast, ARIA patterns, and assistive technology testing. Routed via the production-grade orchestrator (Harden mode).
Feature-level UX audit for React/Next.js code. Catches what Lighthouse, axe, ESLint, and Storybook miss — state coverage gaps (missing loading/empty/error), form data loss on validation, broken focus management, optimistic UI without rollback, skeleton-induced layout shift, vague microcopy, and 25+ other modern frontend UX bugs. Diff-aware (audits changed files only) and produces a 3-tier ship-readiness verdict (release-blocker / fix-this-sprint / backlog) grouped by surface, with concrete fixes using modern React 19 APIs (useActionState, useFormStatus, useOptimistic, useTransition, Suspense). Use before merging a frontend PR, before shipping a feature, or when asked "is this checkout/onboarding/dashboard ready?", "review this PR for UX bugs", "audit this component", "what would break in production?", "is this ready to ship?"
Agent skill that audits vibe-coded apps for common security vulnerabilities introduced by AI coding assistants
SEO & Content Marketing skill suite with keyword research, content audits, SERP analysis, technical SEO commands and multi-step workflows
Create, audit, or consolidate agent skills following the Agent Skills open standard (agentskills.io). Interviews the user relentlessly about intent, scope, and edge cases before drafting. Covers SKILL.md structure, frontmatter, progressive disclosure, description optimization, script bundling, sub-command architecture, setup gates, context systems, and review. Use when the user wants to create a skill, write a skill, build a new skill, make a skill, draft a SKILL.md, or mentions "skill-maker". Also use when asked to review a skill, audit a SKILL.md, check why a skill never triggers, improve an existing skill, or fix a skill. Also use when asked to package expertise, workflows, or domain knowledge into a reusable skill. Also use when asked to consolidate skills, merge skills, combine skills, reduce skill count, or refactor multiple skills into one.
Outsider-perspective end-to-end review of a plan, PR, or code change. First questions intent and whether a simpler/more elegant approach would achieve the same goal, then traces the actual code path (not just the diff) to verify the change does what it claims. Output is concise, actionable, and every call carries its rationale. Trigger on /scrutinize and proactively whenever the user asks to review, audit, sanity-check, or get a second opinion on a plan, PR, diff, design doc, or proposed code change.
Audit a design against Dieter Rams' ten "Good design is..." principles, then hand off a /make-plan prompt for one of three outcomes — new design, refine design, or redesign. Use when the user says "audit this design", "design review", "check this UI against Rams", "is this UI good", "critique this design", "design audit", or asks for a critique that should lead to a plan.
Use when reviewing, scoring, or auditing third-party SaaS / vendor relationships — running a vendor scorecard, tracking SLA compliance, classifying third-party risk, preparing a tier-1 vendor review, or auditing the SaaS portfolio. Triggers on "vendor SLA", "vendor scorecard", "third-party risk", "TPRM", "vendor review", "SaaS audit", "supplier performance", "vendor health check", "renewal review". Forks context so large vendor catalogs (50-500 line items) and SLA logs don't pollute the parent thread. Ships 3 stdlib-only Python tools (vendor scorer with industry tuning, SLA compliance tracker with credit-claim flags, vendor risk classifier across 4 risk vectors), 3 reference docs each citing 7+ authoritative sources (Gartner / Shared Assessments / NIST / ISO 27036 / breach post-mortems), and a 5-vendor catalog template. Distinct from c-level-advisor/general-counsel-advisor (contract law, not operational management), business-growth/contract-and-proposal-writer (outbound proposals, not inbound vendor scoring), and sibling procurement-optimizer (spend categorization, not vendor performance).
Creates selected backend Markdown documentation from code evidence, including architecture/design docs, bounded context maps, developer onboarding, API contracts, and gap analysis for code smells, project-rule violations, DDD issues, coupling, and improvement opportunities. Use when the user asks to document a backend, map backend architecture or domains, onboard backend developers, audit backend documentation gaps, or produce objective backend docs. Do NOT use for frontend docs, generic README writing, or implementing backend changes.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a skill" or "make a command". Make sure to use this skill whenever the user mentions skill creation, command authoring, slash commands, or building Claude extensions — even if they don't explicitly say "create-skill". Not for repairing or auditing existing skills — use repair-skill.
Automatically analyze project state, detect stage, identify gaps, and recommend next steps based on existing artifacts. Use when user asks 'where are we in development', 'what stage are we in', 'full project audit'.