Loading...
Loading...
Found 207 Skills
Walk the user through a PR as a single top-to-bottom narrative ordered by dependency/causal flow, with a heavy scrutiny pass for bugs, missing tests, scope creep, and security. Operates on a temp git worktree so it works while the main working tree is dirty. Use when the user asks to review a PR, walk through a PR, review a PR, or review one branch against another.
Use this skill to run a multi-persona expert advisory review on a labelled pull request in microsoft/apm. The panel fans out to five mandatory specialists plus a test-coverage specialist (active on every PR that touches src/) plus two conditional specialists (auth, doc-writer), all running in their own agent threads, and a CEO synthesizer. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE recommendation comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes follow-ups, and renders a ship-recommendation that the maintainer and author weigh. Activate when a non-trivial PR needs a cross-cutting recommendation (architecture, CLI logging, DevX UX, supply-chain security, growth/positioning, optionally auth, docs, and test coverage, with CEO arbitration).
Triage unresolved PR review comments, produce a severity-ordered fix plan, then resolve or fix each issue with subagents. Use when addressing PR feedback before merge.
Conduct thorough code reviews with structured feedback on security, performance, architecture, and testing. Generates trackable review documents with prioritized issues (critical/required/suggestions) and educational content. Use when reviewing PRs or code changes. Triggers on "review this code", "code review", "review PR".
Agent Skill for Swift architecture design and implementation patterns, with architecture-specific playbooks and review checklists. Use when designing new features, refactoring existing modules, reviewing pull requests, or debugging maintainability issues in SwiftUI/UIKit projects and you need concrete guidance for MVVM, MVI, TCA, Clean Architecture, VIPER, or Reactive patterns.
Analyzes code comments for accuracy, completeness, and long-term maintainability. Identifies misleading comments, comment rot, and documentation gaps. Triggers: After adding documentation, before finalizing a PR, when reviewing comments. Examples: - "Check if the comments are accurate" -> verifies comments match code behavior - "Review the documentation I added" -> analyzes new comments for quality - "Analyze comments for technical debt" -> finds outdated or misleading comments - "Are my docstrings correct?" -> validates documentation accuracy
Code review — both giving and receiving feedback. Verifying observed behavior over performative agreement. Use when reviewing a PR, requesting review on completed work, or processing review feedback you received.
Use when a PR is submitted and ready for peer review, to evaluate another agent's work against task requirements and code quality standards
Performs a structured code review on the current diff or specified files. Checks for correctness, security vulnerabilities, test coverage, code style, and adherence to the project's architecture patterns. Invoked when the user asks for a review, code check, pr review, or quality assessment.
Reply to every PR review comment — from GitHub Copilot, other review bots, and human reviewers — with code fixes or reasoned push-backs. Fetches all comments via the GitHub API, triages each one, fixes code, commits, and posts an inline reply to every comment. Use whenever the user wants to address PR feedback, respond to review comments, handle Copilot's review, clear out reviewer comments, or says 'address the review', 'reply to the comments', 'handle the PR feedback' — even if no specific reviewer is named. Not complete until every comment has a response posted.
Use when reviewing a PR with contrarian inversion to stress-test changes via @coderabbitai, making specific factual claims about dependency behavior that Conejo can later verify by reading library source code. Triggers on proud-zanahoria, contrarian review, inverse review, devil's advocate PR, zanahoria.
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.