Loading...
Loading...
Found 2,039 Skills
Analyze a startup from three perspectives: VC investor, job applicant, and CEO/founder. Use this skill whenever the user wants to evaluate a startup, assess whether to invest in or join a startup, do due diligence, evaluate a job offer from a startup, understand a startup's competitive position, or assess company health and trajectory. Triggers: "analyze this startup", "should I join [company]", "is [company] a good investment", "evaluate [company]", "due diligence on [company]", "what do you think of [startup]", "should I take this startup job offer", "how healthy is [company]", "startup assessment", "company analysis", "is [company] worth joining", "what's the outlook for [company]", "research [company] for me", any mention of evaluating or assessing a startup or tech company from investment, career, or strategic perspectives — provide all three perspectives by default.
Eval enablement accelerator — help customers think through "what does good look like" for their AI agent, then generate a structured eval plan and test cases they can use immediately. No running agent required. Works from a description, an idea, or even a vague goal. Use when anyone mentions agent evaluation, eval planning, "what should we test", "how do we know if the agent is good", test case generation, or interpreting eval results.
Performs financial ratio analysis, DCF valuation, budget variance analysis, and rolling forecast construction for strategic decision-making
Answers AI agent evaluation methodology questions with practical, opinionated guidance grounded primarily in Microsoft's agent evaluation ecosystem (MS Learn, Eval Scenario Library, Triage & Improvement Playbook, Eval Guidance Kit) supplemented by select industry sources.
Use when you need to implement or improve Java metrics observability with Micrometer — including meter design, naming/tag conventions, cardinality control, timers/counters/gauges/distribution summaries, percentiles/histograms, Actuator/Prometheus integration, and metrics validation through tests. This should trigger for requests such as Improve metrics; Apply Micrometer; Add metrics observability; Refactor Micrometer instrumentation. Part of cursor-rules-java project
Systematically evaluate completed short stories or novel chapters to identify strengths, weaknesses, and improvement opportunities. Use after drafting to assess whether the piece achieves its narrative goals.
Launch a meta-judge then a judge sub-agent to evaluate results produced in the current conversation
Quick situational awareness for the current git branch. Summarizes what a feature branch is about by analyzing commits and changes against trunk. On trunk, highlights recent interesting activity. Use when user says "wtf", "what's going on", "what is this branch", "what changed", or "catch me up".
Use this skill when the user's Copilot Studio agent evaluations have come back and they need to interpret scores, diagnose root causes of underperforming test cases, find remediation steps, or analyze patterns to improve their agent. Always use this skill when the user mentions: "eval failed", "why did this fail", "triage", "diagnose failure", "low pass rate", "fix evaluation results", "not passing", "failing test cases", "evaluation results", "improve my eval scores", or any situation where eval scores need interpretation and action.
Use when auditing Claude skills and commands for quality. Supports Quick Scan (changed skills only) and Full Stocktake modes with sequential subagent batch evaluation.
Usability heuristics and principles based on Steve Krug's "Don't Make Me Think" and Jakob Nielsen's 10 heuristics. Use when you need to: (1) audit a UI for usability problems, (2) identify why users are confused or frustrated, (3) simplify navigation and information architecture, (4) conduct heuristic evaluations, (5) prioritize UX fixes by severity, (6) review designs before development, (7) improve form usability, (8) validate that interfaces follow established UX principles.
Complex research requiring deeper analysis, multi-step reasoning, and sophisticated source evaluation for technical, academic, or specialized domain queries needing expert-level analysis, high-stakes decisions, or multi-layered problem solving.