Loading...
Loading...
Found 359 Skills
Use this skill when reviewing, writing, or refactoring code for cleanliness and maintainability following Robert C. Martin's (Uncle Bob) Clean Code principles. Triggers on code review, refactoring, naming improvements, function decomposition, applying SOLID principles, writing clean tests with TDD, identifying code smells, or improving error handling. Covers Clean Code, SOLID, and test-driven development.
Security vetting for AI agent skills. Use before installing any skill from ClawHub, GitHub, or other sources.
Start the diffity diff viewer server for the current working tree or staged changes
Ship workflow: detect + merge base branch, run tests, review diff, bump VERSION, update CHANGELOG, commit, push, create PR.
Open the diffity diff viewer in the browser to see your changes
Review a GitLab Merge Request and provide findings, and post structured review comments with issue explanation plus pseudo code fixes. Use this skill when asked to review a Gitlab Merge request.
Reviews codebases, architectures, PRs, and technical plans for vanity engineering — code and systems built for the developer's ego, resume, or intellectual pleasure rather than delivering user or business value. Triggers on: "review this code", "is this over-engineered", "code review", "architecture review", "complexity audit", "vanity check", "is this necessary", "simplify this", "tech debt review", or any request to evaluate whether code or architecture is justified by actual requirements. Also trigger when the user shares a codebase and asks for feedback, when discussing framework/library choices, when reviewing PRs, or when someone is debating whether to refactor or rebuild. Nudge activation when you detect patterns of unnecessary abstraction, premature optimization, or resume-driven technology choices in code the user shares — even if they haven't asked for a vanity review.
Review and simplify recently changed code for reuse, clarity, and efficiency while preserving behavior. Use when the user asks to simplify, refine, polish, clean up, or make code clearer, after finishing a logical chunk of implementation that should be tightened before commit, or when asked to review changes since a specific commit or branch.
Fast-track an urgent fix through a streamlined pipeline. Skips Product/Feature Council, applies the fix, runs a focused review, and creates a PR with optional Deployment Council. Use for production bugs, security patches, or critical regressions that cannot wait for the full planning pipeline.
Walk every branching path and boundary condition in content, report only unhandled edge cases. Orthogonal to adversarial review - method-driven not attitude-driven. Use when you need exhaustive edge-case analysis of code, specs, or diffs.
Python design patterns for CLI scripts and utilities — type-first development, deep modules, complexity management, and red flags. Use when reading, writing, reviewing, or refactoring Python files, especially in .trellis/scripts/ or any CLI/scripting context. Also activate when planning module structure, deciding where to put new code, or doing code review.
Applies and explains code conventions across TypeScript, React, C#, and Markdown. Enforces naming rules, file naming patterns, TSDoc and XML doc standards, inline comment intent (the *why*, not the *what*), code structure, error handling, async patterns, and dead code policy. Also enforces ADR and contributor doc decisions, and flags decisions that appear stale or misaligned with current tooling. USE FOR: convention questions, code review against project standards, applying naming rules, auditing intent comments, checking TSDoc completeness, enforcing recorded ADR decisions, and flagging stale architectural decisions. DO NOT USE FOR: security vulnerability scanning, performance profiling, runtime debugging, or generating net-new code without a review target.