Loading...
Loading...
Found 207 Skills
Review a diff, PR, branch, or path across ten orthogonal dimensions (correctness, security, encapsulation, spec, complexity, deslop, assertions, NIH, efficiency, telemetry) and emit a severity-grouped findings report. Use when the user wants a code review — phrases like "review this", "/age", "is this safe to merge", "find bugs", "spot security issues", "check for slop", "review my PR", "what's wrong with this code". Use even when the user only asks for one dimension — the report scopes itself. Do NOT use for applying fixes (route to /cure) or test hardening (route to /press).
Write Continue check files that review pull requests with AI agents. Use when the user asks to create, write, or generate a check, or wants to enforce a convention on PRs.
Code review and PR review skill for Python PySide6/Qt 6.8+ applications. Focuses on modern best practices, performance, thread safety, signal/slot patterns, Model/View architecture, QML integration, and async patterns. Use when reviewing Python Qt code, PySide6 PRs, GUI application code, or when asked to review code that uses QtWidgets, QtQuick, QtCore, QtGui, or any Qt module. Catches common anti-patterns, memory issues, thread violations, and suggests modern Qt 6.8+ idioms.
Commit standards for Engram contributors. Trigger: Any commit creation, review, or branch cleanup.
Fetches and classifies PR review feedback with context isolation. Returns structured JSON with thread IDs for deterministic resolution. Use when analyzing PR comments before addressing them.
4-phase code review methodology: UNDERSTAND changes, VERIFY claims against code, ASSESS security/performance/architecture risks, DOCUMENT findings with severity classification. Use when reviewing pull requests, auditing code before release, evaluating external contributions, or pre-merge verification. Use for "review PR", "code review", "audit code", "check this PR", or "review my changes". Do NOT use for writing new code or implementing features.
Automated code review for security, performance, and maintainability. Use when asked for code review, security audit, quality check, PR review, or to find issues in code.
Guides structured code review with a checklist approach. Use when reviewing PRs, diffs, or code changes before merging.
Use this skill when addressing, responding to, or resolving PR review comments on GitHub pull requests. Triggers on "address PR comments", "respond to review", "handle review feedback", "reply to PR comments", "fix review comments", or when the user wants to process open review threads on their PR. Uses the gh CLI to fetch unresolved comments, make code changes where agreed, and post batch replies with a humble, thankful tone.
Performs a comprehensive security review of code changes in a GitHub PR or issue. Checks out the branch, analyzes changed files against a 9-category security checklist, and produces PASS/WARNING/FAIL verdicts. Use when reviewing pull requests for security vulnerabilities, hardcoded secrets, injection flaws, auth bypasses, or insecure configurations. Trigger keywords - security review, code review, appsec, vulnerability assessment, security audit, review PR security.
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Use when reviewing PRs or standardizing review practices.
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues.