Loading...
Loading...
Found 258 Skills
Generate a complete set of multi-angle product shots — front, side, back, top-down, and 45-degree perspective — for comprehensive product visualization.
Generate aerial drone-perspective footage — sweeping bird's-eye views, orbit shots, and flyover sequences for landscapes, architecture, and events.
Outsider-perspective end-to-end review of a plan, PR, or code change. First questions intent and whether a simpler/more elegant approach would achieve the same goal, then traces the actual code path (not just the diff) to verify the change does what it claims. Output is concise, actionable, and every call carries its rationale. Trigger on /scrutinize and proactively whenever the user asks to review, audit, sanity-check, or get a second opinion on a plan, PR, diff, design doc, or proposed code change.
Simulate a Nature-style reviewer assessment from the referee perspective rather than an author rebuttal. Use when the user wants a pre-submission review, reviewer report, peer-review style critique, novelty/significance/technical soundness assessment, reviewer-style manuscript evaluation, 审稿人视角评估, 预审稿意见, or Nature reviewer report. Return 3 reviewer reports plus a cross-review synthesis, grounded only in the local Nature reviewer source basis.
Write effective user stories that capture requirements from the user's perspective. Create clear stories with detailed acceptance criteria to guide development and define done.
Multi-Model Collaboration — Invoke gemini-agent and codex-agent for auxiliary analysis **Trigger Scenarios** (Proactive Use): - In-depth code analysis: algorithm understanding, performance bottleneck identification, architecture sorting - Large-scale exploration: 5+ files, module dependency tracking, call chain tracing - Complex reasoning: solution evaluation, logic verification, concurrent security analysis - Multi-perspective decision-making: requiring analysis from different angles before comprehensive judgment **Non-Trigger Scenarios**: - Simple modifications (clear changes in 1-2 files) - File searching (use Explore or Glob/Grep) - Read/write operations on known paths **Core Principle**: You are the decision-maker and executor, while external models are consultants.
Guide to review incoming one-way (unilateral) commercial NDAs in a jurisdiction-agnostic way, from either a Recipient or Discloser perspective (user-selected), producing a clause-by-clause issue log with preferred redlines, fallbacks, rationales, owners, and deadlines.
Form a high-level investment committee consisting of three virtual experts modeled after legendary investors (Buffett, Wood, Druckenmiller) to conduct independent multi-round adversarial debates. True independent thinking is achieved through physically isolated Gemini API calls, and final resolutions are formed via voting. Use when evaluating investment decisions, reviewing stock research reports, or seeking multi-perspective analysis on public companies.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "think laterally", "apply De Bono's method", "break out of this pattern", "generate creative alternatives", "use lateral thinking", "apply provocation", "use Six Hats", "challenge assumptions", or wants to process input through Edward de Bono's Lateral Thinking to escape dominant patterns and generate new perspectives.
Generate attention-grabbing hooks from 5 investor archetype perspectives to find angles that resonate with different audience motivations.
Executes comprehensive PR reviews following Freenet standards. Performs four-perspective review covering code-first analysis, testing, skeptical review, and big-picture assessment.
This skill is used when users explicitly request "review NSFC proposals", "simulate expert review", or "evaluate NSFC applications". It simulates the perspective of domain experts to conduct multi-dimensional reviews of NSFC proposals, outputting graded issues and actionable modification suggestions. ⚠️ Not applicable: when users only want to write/modify a specific section of a proposal (use the nsfc-*-writer series skills instead), only want to understand review criteria (answer directly), or have no clear "review/evaluate" intent.