Loading...
Loading...
Found 2,412 Skills
GitHub data collection patterns for workflow agents. Covers search query construction by intent, date range handling, repository scope narrowing, preferences.md integration, cross-repo intelligence, parallel stream collection model, and auto-recovery for empty results. Use when building agents that search GitHub for issues, PRs, discussions, releases, security alerts, or CI status.
End-to-end XRPL development playbook. Covers XRP Ledger dApp development including project scaffolding (create-xrp), wallet integration (xrpl-connect), client SDKs, transactions, tokens, NFTs, DEX/AMM, cross-chain interoperability (Axelar), and security best practices.
Source code security audit using backward taint analysis, slot type classification, render context verification, and 3-phase parallel review producing an exploitation queue.
Run a formal, multi-dimensional code review of a pull request. Reads the PR diff, classifies change types, dispatches parallel reviewers by dimension (correctness, consistency, docs-sync, plus conditional security/edge-cases/UX/performance/structure/maintainability), and synthesizes findings into an actionable punch list. Use when the user asks to review a PR, run /deep-review, mark a PR as ready for review, or requests a formal/thorough code review.
Technical due diligence for M&A, investment, or acquisition. Reads a target company's codebase and generates a comprehensive tech DD report with architecture assessment, tech debt quantification, scalability analysis, security posture, team capability inference, build system quality, test coverage, deployment maturity, and open source license risks. Outputs tech-dd-report.md formatted like a real investment memo with risk ratings, remediation costs, and go/no-go recommendation.
WARNING - This repository distributes pirated software and potential malware disguised as Avast Premium Security
Guides VP-level cloud program leadership—multi-year cloud strategy and migration/modernization portfolio, landing zone and CCoE operating model at org scale, hyperscaler enterprise agreement and commit governance, hybrid/multi-cloud posture, cloud center of excellence and talent, and board/CFO/CTO cloud narratives. Use when setting cloud direction, prioritizing migration waves, governing EA/MACC and cloud spend envelope, designing federated cloud org model, steering CCoE and standards adoption, preparing executive or board cloud updates, or adjudicating product vs platform vs security cloud trade-offs—not for Terraform/K8s implementation (cloud-engineer, infrastructure-engineer), landing zone technical design (enterprise-cloud-architect, cloud-architect), monthly CUR FinOps (finops-analyst), TCO/NPV modeling (cloud-economist), full infra portfolio including DC capex (vp-of-infrastructure), or GL close (compute-accounting-manager).
Use when an RFP, RFI, RFQ, security questionnaire, vendor questionnaire, or proposal request arrives and the team needs a structured response — parsing multi-section buyer-dictated requirements (MANDATORY vs WEIGHTED vs NICE-TO-HAVE), building a Shipley-method proof-point matrix mapping each requirement to a verifiable proof point, articulating 3-5 win-themes that ladder up across requirements, and producing a Shipley-derived winrate estimate that informs a bid / no-bid / partner-bid recommendation. For Bid Managers, Proposal Leads, Directors of Sales, and Sales Engineers at the response-strategy moment. Surfaces GAP requirements explicitly — never invents claims. NOT free-form proposal narrative authoring, NOT contract redline, NOT marketing collateral.
Use when code has been written and needs validation before committing, or when the user asks for a code review or security check.
Delegate menial, well-scoped coding tasks to a cheap Qwen-backed subagent via the `claude-9arm` command instead of burning Claude tokens/quota. Use when the work is mechanical and low-risk — bulk renames, formatting, boilerplate, find-replace, grep-style search & summarization, reading/condensing logs or files, test/docstring/comment scaffolding, or running builds/linters/tests and reporting pass-fail. Also use when the user says "use qwen", "delegate this", "send it to 9arm/qwen", or "do this cheaply". Do NOT use for architecture, design, debugging judgment, security-sensitive edits, or anything needing this conversation's context.
Deploys a baseline landing zone foundation for a Google Cloud Organization, establishing security guardrails using Organization Policies, resource hierarchy folders and projects, billing association, and centralized logging and monitoring. Deploys Google Cloud's recommended security controls and architecture. Use when setting up a new Google Cloud Organization or establishing a secure, enterprise-grade landing zone foundation. Don't use for individual project onboarding (use google-cloud-recipe-onboarding or product-specific skills instead).
Performs comprehensive Rust security review for safe/unsafe boundary issues, memory safety in unsafe blocks, concurrency hazards, panic-induced DoS, FFI safety, and async runtime mistakes. Use when auditing Rust crates, services, or libraries — particularly those with `unsafe`, FFI, or concurrent code.