Loading...
Loading...
Found 2,737 Skills
Verification loop for Laravel projects: env checks, linting, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, and deployment readiness.
Solve competition math problems (IMO, Putnam, USAMO, AIME) with adversarial verification that catches the errors self-verification misses. Activates when asked to 'solve this IMO problem', 'prove this olympiad inequality', 'verify this competition proof', 'find a counterexample', 'is this proof correct', or for any problem with 'IMO', 'Putnam', 'USAMO', 'olympiad', or 'competition math' in it. Uses pure reasoning (no tools) — then a fresh-context adversarial verifier attacks the proof using specific failure patterns, not generic 'check logic'. Outputs calibrated confidence — will say 'no confident solution' rather than bluff. If LaTeX is available, produces a clean PDF after verification passes.
Use when the user needs to build MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers — tool definitions, resource management, prompt templates, transport layers, and client integration. Triggers: user says "MCP", "MCP server", "model context protocol", building tools for AI clients, creating AI integrations.
Standardize and validate SKILL.md files against the Agent Skills specification (agentskills.io). Use when creating new skills, auditing existing skills for spec compliance, converting legacy skill formats to standard structure, or improving descriptions for reliable triggering. Triggers on: "validate skill", "create SKILL.md", "standardize skill format", "check skill spec", "skill frontmatter", "improve skill description", "add evals to skill".
Validate, lint, audit, or fix PromQL queries and alerting rules; detects anti-patterns.
Diagnose planning directory health and optionally repair issues
Format and validate code in various languages. Python, JavaScript, JSON, YAML, Markdown, and more. Uses standard formatters when available.
Grassroots-first campaign design for anyone being outspent — startups vs. incumbents, NGOs vs. corporate comms, movements vs. state-backed machines, solo brands vs. big-budget competitors. Ideates awareness, launch, fundraising, mobilization, community-build, counter-narrative, referral, founder-story, and coalition campaigns. Triggers on "campaign plan", "marketing strategy", "ad budget", "should I advertise", "paid vs organic", "launch plan", "grassroots", "low budget marketing", "NGO campaign", "outspent", "competitor has bigger budget", "how do I compete without money". Also trigger on any spend asymmetry, collapsing organic reach, rising CPAs, or a trust/credibility problem — even without the word "campaign". Nudge activation when the user debates buying ads, boosting posts, or hiring influencers; they are likely about to burn money on a channel that will not persuade.
Adversarial stress-test of a /think intelligence brief. Reads the think output markdown, then deploys 5-7 of the same analytical frameworks — but each one is hunting exclusively for reasons the recommendation is wrong, the conviction is unearned, and the idea will fail. Every framework becomes a prosecutor, not a judge. Surfaces the strongest kill shots, identifies which parts of the original brief are load-bearing but unverified, and produces a Red Team Report with a survival verdict. Use when the user says "red-team this", "attack this", "poke holes", "steel-man the opposition", "why is this a bad idea", "/red-team", or presents a /think brief they want stress-tested.
Teaches PMs to create syntactically valid mermaid diagrams by selecting the right diagram type for their communication need, following syntax validity rules, and validating before shipping. Covers all 15 mermaid diagram types with PM-relevant examples and a dual-lens navigation system.
Designs an A/B test or experiment with clear hypothesis, variants, success metrics, sample size, and duration. Use when planning experiments to validate product changes or test hypotheses.
Use this skill for "review this paper", "review this manuscript", "peer review", "review my paper", "critique this manuscript", "review this submission", "give me feedback on my paper", "check my methods", "review my statistics", "review as a peer reviewer", "evaluate this manuscript", "review this PDF", or mentions manuscript review, peer review, paper critique, or methodological review.