Loading...
Loading...
Found 372 Skills
Create actionable buyer personas using Adele Revella's 5 Rings of Buying Insight methodology—based on real buyer stories, not demographics. Use when: **Understand why buyers buy** (or don't buy) your solution; **Create personas that drive action** rather than gather dust; **Align marketing and sales** around real buyer insights; **Develop messaging** that resonates with actual decision-makers; **Map content** to the buyer's journey
A methodology for iteratively improving agent-facing text instructions (skills / slash commands / task prompts / CLAUDE.md sections / code-generation prompts) by having a bias-free executor actually run them and evaluating two-sidedly (executor self-report + instruction-side metrics). Keep iterating until improvements plateau. Use it right after creating or substantially revising a prompt or skill, or when you want to attribute an agent's unexpected behavior to ambiguity on the instruction side.
Evidence-based Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) assessment skill modeled after the Micromedex Drug-Reax methodology. Trigger this skill whenever the user types /drug-drug, mentions "drug interaction", "DDI", "drug-drug", "can I take X with Y", "interaction between", "交互作用", "併用", or asks whether two medications can be used together. This skill performs systematic literature retrieval via PubMed, CrossRef, and WebSearch, then produces a structured assessment report with Severity, Documentation, Onset, Mechanism, Clinical Effects, and Management — mirroring the Micromedex Drug-Reax classification framework. Even casual questions like "is it safe to combine A and B" should trigger this skill.
Applies the Bullseye Framework from Traction by Gabriel Weinberg and Justin Mares. Use when choosing growth channels, testing customer acquisition strategies, or deciding where to spend marketing effort. Covers all 19 traction channels with selection methodology, testing protocol, and phase-matched channel advice. Triggers include 'how do we get customers', 'which marketing channel should we use', 'we have a product but no users', 'our growth has stalled', 'should we do content marketing or paid ads', 'how do we test traction channels', 'what channels work at our stage'. NOT for product development (use Lean Startup), not for positioning/messaging (use Obviously Awesome), not for pricing (use Monetizing Innovation), not for enterprise sales methodology (use SPIN Selling).
Coaches sales teams on elite discovery methodology — question design, current-state mapping, gap quantification, and call structure that surfaces real buying motivation.
Decompose requirements into structured task lists and build a task management system for long-running Agents (based on the Anthropic Effective harnesses methodology). Automatically trigger when users need to manage multi-session development tasks, track feature completion progress, or request "task decomposition", "task management", or "project planning".
Design for everyone by treating accessibility as a first-class design discipline, not a compliance checklist. Part of the Intent design strategy system. Covers WCAG 2.2 for designers, screen reader experience design, keyboard navigation, cognitive accessibility, motor accessibility, inclusive design beyond compliance, and accessibility testing methodology. Trigger on: accessibility, a11y, WCAG, screen reader, keyboard navigation, color contrast, alt text, focus management, touch targets, inclusive design, assistive technology, "is this accessible", "check accessibility", "design for everyone", "who are we excluding", ADA compliance, Section 508, EAA, reduced motion, or any question about whether all users can perceive, operate, understand, and benefit from the experience. One billion people worldwide have a disability. Everyone experiences situational impairment. Designing inclusively makes the experience better for everyone.
Write a high-quality prompt for any LLM or AI assistant — Claude, Claude Code, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot, or any coding / chat agent. Use this skill whenever the user asks to write, improve, refine, shorten, or rewrite a prompt; asks "how should I phrase this for [model]" or "what's a good prompt for [task]"; describes a task they want an AI to do but hasn't yet formulated it as a prompt; or pastes an existing prompt and asks for revision. Based on Boris's (Anthropic, Claude Code creator) prompt methodology — short and accurate prompts, plan-before-code, feedback loops, persistent context in files. The universal principles (short, plan-first, feedback-loop, no-padding) apply to any LLM; the Claude-Code-specific anchors (CLAUDE.md, @file, slash commands) only apply when the target is Claude Code. If the user's intent is unclear (target model, deliverable, scope, or whether the AI has a way to self-verify is missing), ask 1–3 targeted clarifying questions via AskUserQuestion before writing the prompt.
Perform thorough code reviews following Google's 5-step methodology. Use when reviewing pull requests, change lists, or any code changes to ensure quality, correctness, and maintainability.
Verify a research claim or academic citation by tracing it through publication → methodology → raw data → independent replication. Routes through perplexity-research for the actual web lookup, then formats results as a citation-checked brain page. Use when a book/article/conversation cites a study and you want to confirm the claim is real, replicated, and accurately characterized.
Use when doing dev-stage self-review on the current branch before pushing or opening a PR — runs an auto-loop of codex review (cross-model, OpenAI) + per-finding fix + re-review until findings converge or stop conditions fire. Codex follows pr-review's multi-role methodology (security / staff-engineer / sdet / spec-auditor). Triggers — 'self review', 'self-review', '自己 review', '自我 review', 'cross-model review', 'pre-push review', 'review and fix my branch'. NOT for live PR review with sticky/inline comments (use pr-review), NOT for managed PR babysitting (use pr-babysit), NOT for first-time review without intent to fix (use mode=review-only opt-in).
Assesses how ready a business is for AI adoption across six dimensions. Evaluates data maturity, tech stack, team skills, process documentation, budget, and culture. Generates a comprehensive ai-readiness-report.md with scores, gap analysis, and recommended starting points. Aligned with OneWave AI's audit methodology.