Loading...
Loading...
Found 258 Skills
Multi-AI Agent P2P Debate. Suitable for technical solution stress testing, multi-perspective collision, and design decision convergence. Use it when you want a solution to be challenged or to understand the pros and cons of different technical routes. Triggered when mentioning "debate", "agent discussion", "multi-angle analysis", or "start a team".
Comprehensive geospatial science skill covering remote sensing, GIS, spatial analysis, machine learning for earth observation, and 30+ scientific domains. Supports satellite imagery processing (Sentinel, Landsat, MODIS, SAR, hyperspectral), vector and raster data operations, spatial statistics, point cloud processing, network analysis, cloud-native workflows (STAC, COG, Planetary Computer), and 8 programming languages (Python, R, Julia, JavaScript, C++, Java, Go, Rust) with 500+ code examples. Use for remote sensing workflows, GIS analysis, spatial ML, Earth observation data processing, terrain analysis, hydrological modeling, marine spatial analysis, atmospheric science, and any geospatial computation task.
Adversarial scenario analysis and threat modeling for Solidity smart contracts. Use when analyzing contracts from an attacker's perspective, identifying multi-step attack vectors, or performing threat modeling. Covers flash loan attacks, oracle manipulation, MEV/front-running, governance exploits, reentrancy scenarios, access control bypasses, economic logic exploits, and cross-contract composability risks. Triggers on tasks involving adversarial analysis, threat modeling, attack scenarios, attack vectors, exploit analysis, or red team review.
Consult external LLMs (Gemini, OpenAI/Codex, Qwen) for second opinions, alternative plans, independent reviews, or delegated tasks. Use when a user asks for another model's perspective, wants to compare answers, or requests delegating a subtask to Gemini/Codex/Qwen.
Two-round debate protocol where perspectives challenge each other before consensus. Round 1 presents independent positions, Round 2 allows counter-arguments and rebuttals. Produces battle-tested decisions for high-stakes choices.
Replace generic perspectives with domain-specific expert roles selected dynamically per request. Automatically picks the 3 most relevant experts from a role pool (Security, Performance, UX, Cost, DX, Architecture, etc.) based on the task context.
Draws 4 Tarot cards using os.urandom() to inject entropy into planning when prompts are vague or underspecified. Interprets the spread to guide next steps. Use when the user is nonchalant, feeling lucky, says 'let fate decide', makes Yu-Gi-Oh references ('heart of the cards'), demonstrates indifference about approach, or says 'try again' on a system with no changes. Also triggers on sufficiently ambiguous prompts where multiple approaches are equally valid.
Apply a latticework of mental models from multiple disciplines to improve decision quality. Use this skill when the user needs to think more clearly, avoid cognitive blind spots, apply cross-disciplinary reasoning, or evaluate a complex decision from multiple angles — even if they say 'how should I think about this', 'what am I missing', 'give me a different perspective', or 'what frameworks apply here'.
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission. Codex designs ablations from a reviewer's perspective, CC reviews feasibility and implements.
This skill should be used when the user wants to implement features or fix bugs using test-driven development. Enforces the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle with vertical slicing, context isolation between test writing and implementation, human checkpoints, and auto-test feedback loops. Uses multi-agent orchestration with the Task tool for architecturally enforced context isolation. Supports Jest, Vitest, pytest, Go test, cargo test, PHPUnit, and RSpec.
Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes /cs:board, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question.
Use this skill when the user asks for creative thinking (including naming it or directing use/apply/run with obvious misspellings; decisive) or wants divergent ideation—fluency, flexible perspectives, novel combinations, and elaboration, with optional light convergence. Use when they want fresh ideas, blue-sky options, reframes, or more variety before committing, including casual or messy prompts. Skip when they want a single delivered answer with no exploration, audit-only teardown with no generation asked for, or purely mechanical execution.