Loading...
Loading...
Found 8,327 Skills
Manages parent/child agent relationships with task delegation and result aggregation. Supports sequential chains, parallel fans, conditional routing, retry logic, timeout handling, and YAML-based visual workflow definition.
Build and edit live Superwall paywalls from the CLI. Attach to a running browser editor session using a pairing code, list the tools the browser exposes right now, and invoke them. Covers native sw-* elements, editing workflow, design standards, and the attach/call/release lifecycle. Use whenever the user wants to design, build, modify, or review a Superwall paywall, onboarding, or web2app flow.
Provides Qwen Coder CLI delegation workflows for coding tasks using Qwen2.5-Coder and QwQ models, including English prompt formulation, execution flags, and safe result handling. Use when the user explicitly asks to use Qwen for tasks such as code generation, refactoring, debugging, or architectural analysis. Triggers on "use qwen", "use qwen coder", "delegate to qwen", "ask qwen", "second opinion from qwen", "qwen opinion", "continue with qwen", "qwen session".
Generate polished technical diagrams as SVG, and export PNG when local export tooling is available. Use when the user wants an architecture diagram, flowchart, data flow, sequence diagram, agent or memory diagram, comparison matrix, timeline, or concept map rendered as a visual artifact instead of Mermaid or a hand-drawn whiteboard. Trigger on requests like 画图、帮我画、生成图、 做个图、架构图、流程图、时序图、可视化一下, or English requests such as draw diagram, architecture diagram, visualize this system, generate a flowchart, or create a technical SVG. Prefer this skill when the user wants publishable SVG/PNG output, style selection, or AI/agent-system diagram conventions.
Worldline integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Worldline data.
Issue Workflow Stage 3——Fix code precisely based on confirmed root cause and solution, verify the effect, and document it in {slug}-fix-note.md. This is the final stage of the issue workflow—no verification loop means the workflow is incomplete. Two entry points: the standard path is triggered from easysdd-issue-analyze (with existing {slug}-analysis.md), and the quick path is triggered directly from easysdd-issue-report (without {slug}-analysis.md, as the root cause was determined by AI reading code during the report stage). Trigger scenarios: user says 'Start fixing the bug', 'Fix according to analysis', 'Start modifying code'. During repair, only modify the files stated in the solution; do not optimize casually or introduce new abstractions—these actions will make the scope spread to untraceable levels.
Phase 1 of the feature workflow — Draft a design document for the new feature, which serves as the sole input for subsequent implementation and acceptance. First gather evidence (read architecture docs, review relevant code, grep to prevent term conflicts, check archives), then write a complete first draft in one go (including YAML frontmatter + three-layer structure + test design), submit it to the user for overall review, and iterate until approval. After approval, extract {slug}-checklist.yaml from {slug}-design.md for use in the next two phases. Trigger scenarios: "Start designing the solution", "Write design doc", "Prepare to implement XX", with the prerequisite that you already know what to do, who it's for, and how to define success.
Onboard a new repository or a repository with scattered documents into the easysdd system. Two paths are automatically determined: the empty repository path (no spec-like documents or easysdd/ directory in the repository) builds the skeleton from scratch; the migration path (the repository already has scattered documents or partial easysdd/ structure) first generates an audit report + migration mapping plan, which is confirmed by the user one by one before implementation. This skill only does two things: "build the skeleton" and "organize existing documents". After the skeleton is built, all sub-workflows can run directly. Trigger scenarios: the user says "Use easysdd in this project", "Build easysdd structure", "Initialize easysdd", "Migrate to easysdd".
Phase 2 of the feature workflow — Write code according to the implementation sequence in {slug}-design.md, and submit a completion report in a unified format for user review after finishing. Prerequisites: {slug}-design.md has been approved (standard design includes test design, or fastforward design includes acceptance criteria), and {slug}-checklist.yaml exists in the same directory. Trigger scenarios: User says "The plan is confirmed, start implementation", "Write code according to the plan", "Start working". If you encounter situations not covered by the plan during implementation (new concepts, out-of-scope files, need for patch branches), proactively stop and discuss with the user based on the plan, do not proceed forcefully.
Phase 1 of the Issue Workflow - Translate the user's problem into a reproducible, traceable {slug}-report.md through conversation. The AI only asks "what you saw, how to reproduce it, what should happen" here, and does not guess the root cause for the user (that's Phase 2's responsibility). This phase is also the only official decision point for determining whether to take the fast track or the standard path: first read the relevant code based on the user's description, and if the root cause can be identified at a glance and the changes required are minor, directly inform the user to take the fast track. Trigger scenarios: The user says "file an issue", "log this bug", "I found a problem". This is the starting point of the issue workflow with no pre-requisites.
The root skill of the easysdd workflow family — introduces the workflow system and routes users to the correct sub-skill. Trigger scenarios: Users mention "easysdd", "sdd", "spec-driven", "how to use this set of processes", "which skill should I use", "where to start", or describe a new feature but haven't decided on the entry stage. Known intents (brainstorm/design/implementation/acceptance/BUG/exploration, etc.) will trigger the corresponding sub-skill first instead of this skill.
Phase 3 of the feature workflow – Complete the acceptance closed loop. Two tasks: First, check layer by layer against {slug}-design.md to verify if the implementation deviates from the plan; if deviations are found, fix them immediately instead of just "noting them down" in the report. Second, integrate this feature into the project's overall architecture documentation. Finally, produce a {slug}-acceptance.md as the closed-loop proof for the entire workflow. Predecessor dependency easysdd-feature-implement must be completed. Trigger scenarios: User says "The feature is done, let's accept it", "Do the final check", "Prepare for merge", "Generate the acceptance report".