Loading...
Loading...
Found 54 Skills
Intelligent agent for validating ERPNext/Frappe code against best practices and common pitfalls. Use when reviewing generated code, checking for errors before deployment, or validating code quality. Triggers: review this code, check my script, validate before deployment, is this correct, find bugs, check for errors, will this work.
Meta-skill for validating the integrity and quality of other skills. automatically checks for SKILL.md existence, script syntax errors (via Godot CLI), and metadata completeness. Use this skill to verify the entire skill library. Trigger keywords: validation, continuous_integration, quality_assurance, syntax_check, metadata_check.
Multi-agent code review with specialized perspectives (security, performance, patterns, simplification, tests)
Periodic repository health check — dependencies, git, CI/CD, code quality, docs, security. Use when: onboarding to a repo, weekly maintenance, after big refactors, before audits, "is this repo in good shape?". Triggers: "repo hygiene", "health check", "repo health", "clean up repo", "maintenance check", "audit repo", "repo audit".
Run tests, linting, and quality checks for WooCommerce development. Use when running tests, fixing code style, or following the development workflow.
Worker that runs parallel external agent reviews (Codex + Gemini) on code changes. Background tasks, process-as-arrive, critical verification with debate. Returns filtered suggestions with confidence scoring.
Execute implementation plan tasks with TDD workflow, auto-commit, and phase gates. Use when user says "build it", "start building", "execute plan", "implement tasks", "ship it", or references a track ID. Do NOT use for planning (use /plan) or scaffolding (use /scaffold).
Adaptive test-driven development cycle. Detects harness capabilities and routes to guided (manual phase control) or automated (orchestrated) mode. Invoke with /tdd for automated or /tdd red|domain|green|commit for guided.
Loads org- and repo-level coding rules from Qodo before code tasks begin, ensuring all generation and modification follows team standards. Use before any code generation or modification task when rules are not already loaded. Invoke when user asks to write, edit, refactor, or review code, or when starting implementation planning.
Architecture analysis, violation detection, and pattern validation. USE WHEN: reviewing code architecture, identifying violations, verifying patterns, updating technical documentation. Reference: docs/02-architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md Examples: <example> Context: User wants to check if code follows architecture. user: "Analyze if the payment module follows our architecture" assistant: "I'll use architecture-analyzer to review against ARCHITECTURE.md." <commentary>Architectural review is architecture-analyzer specialty.</commentary> </example> <example> Context: Need to identify technical debt. user: "Find architectural violations in the services layer" assistant: "I'll use architecture-analyzer to scan for violations." <commentary>Violation detection is architecture-analyzer responsibility.</commentary> </example>
This skill should be used when the user requests actions such as 'review code', 'do a code review', 'review my branch', 'review MR !1234', or 'review PR'
Review backend code for quality, security, maintainability, and best practices based on established checklist rules. Use when the user requests a review, analysis, or improvement of backend files (e.g., `.py`) under the `api/` directory. Do NOT use for frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Supports pending-change review, code snippets review, and file-focused review.