Loading...
Loading...
Found 459 Skills
Use when explicitly asked to run the code-reviewer subagent or when another skill requires the code-reviewer agent card.
Comprehensive pre-merge validation checklist for Python/React pull requests. Use before approving or merging any PR. Covers code quality checks (linting, formatting, type checking), test coverage requirements, documentation updates, migration safety, API contract compatibility, accessibility compliance, bundle size impact, and deployment readiness. Provides a systematic checklist that ensures nothing is missed before merge. Does NOT cover security review depth (use code-review-security).
Git branching strategies, conflict resolution, rebase workflows, monorepo patterns, and advanced operations like cherry-pick, bisect, and reflog recovery. Activate on "git", "branching strategy", "merge conflict", "rebase", "cherry-pick", "monorepo git", "git bisect", "git reflog", "squash commits". NOT for GitHub Actions CI/CD (use github-actions-pipeline-builder), GitHub API/webhooks, or PR review processes (use code-review-checklist).
Claude Code Command Selection Guide - Automatically recommend and select the right commands, agents, and skills in Claude Code. Use when: (1) user is unsure which command or tool to use, (2) needs to decide which agent/skill best fits the current task, (3) querying usage scenarios for /plan, /tdd, /compact, /loop and other commands, (4) understanding when to invoke planner, code-reviewer, build-error-resolver and other agents, (5) needs command cheat sheet or decision flowchart. Triggers: "which command to use", "which agent", "command selection", "how to use /plan", "when to use /compact", "agent selection guide", "command cheat sheet", "skill recommendation".
Review Skill definition quality. Use when user asks to "review skill", "check skill quality", "validate skill", "lint skill", "review my skill", or wants to check if a Skill follows best practices. For execution trace analysis, use when user explicitly mentions "analyze execution", "review trace", or "evaluate execution process". Do NOT use for runtime debugging (use agent-debug skill), code review (use code-review skill), or general file validation.
This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, performing comprehensive code review, analyzing code changes before merge, or when the user asks for thorough/ultra-critical code review. Performs EXTREMELY CRITICAL 6-pass analysis identifying runtime failures, code consistency issues, architectural problems, environment compatibility risks, and verification strategies. Posts structured review as GitHub PR comment. Use when user asks to "review PR", "review this code", "review changes", "check this PR", "analyze PR", "post review", or for Phase 3 of devflow. Supports parallel review mode with multiplier (code-review-3, code-review 6X) for consensus-based reviews. This is an ultra-critical reviewer that does not let things slip and desires only perfection.
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.
Dispatch code-reviewer agent for two-stage review. Use after completing implementation tasks.
[Testing] Autonomous subagent variant of code-review. Use when reviewing code changes, pull requests, or performing refactoring analysis with focus on patterns, security, and performance.
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims, PR review, subagent-driven review, completion verification. Actions: review, evaluate, verify, validate code changes. Keywords: code review, PR review, pull request, technical feedback, review feedback, completion claim, verification, evidence-based, code quality, review request, technical rigor, subagent review, code-reviewer, review gate, merge criteria. Use when: receiving code review feedback, completing major features, making completion claims, requesting systematic reviews, validating before merge, preventing false completion claims.
Update Knowledge Base — Execute doc-updater, code-reviewer, and learn-eval in sequence to solidify the changes from this session into documents and knowledge.
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session