Loading...
Loading...
Found 798 Skills
Generate a single-file interactive HTML code-review artifact for a GitHub PR. Fetches the diff via the gh CLI, performs an honest severity-coded self-review, and renders an artifact with: collapsible per-file diffs with colored inline annotations, severity filter chips, per-finding checkboxes, and a "Create feedback prompt" modal that aggregates the checked items into a paste-ready follow-up prompt ending with "Please address this feedback. Address each individual item in its own conventional commit." Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a pull request visually, asks for an HTML or static review artifact, says "review PR", "review this PR", "build a PR review", wants color-coded findings, feedback aggregation, or a review file they can share — even if they don't explicitly say "HTML". Also trigger on "code review artifact", "interactive review", "feedback prompt for a PR", or when the user mentions reviewing a specific PR number.
Take a PR from review to merged — run the repo's code-review skill on it in a loop (review, fix, re-review) until nothing is left to fix, applying ALL fixes on the PR branch, wait for CI green, then squash-merge. Use when asked to "ship it", "ship PR
Conditional code-review persona, selected when the diff touches TypeScript code. Reviews changes with Kieran's strict bar for type safety, clarity, and maintainability.
AI-powered code review using CodeRabbit. Default code-review skill. Trigger for any explicit review request AND autonomously when the agent thinks a review is needed (code/PR/quality/security).
Review code architecture for maintainability, catch structural issues before they become debtUse when "Reviewing pull requests with structural changes, Planning refactoring work, Evaluating new feature architecture, Assessing technical debt, Before major releases, When code feels "hard to change", architecture, code-review, refactoring, design-patterns, technical-debt, dependencies, maintainability" mentioned.
This skill should be used for structured feature development with codebase understanding. Triggers on /do command. Provides a 5-phase workflow (Understand, Clarify, Design, Implement, Complete) using codeagent-wrapper to orchestrate code-explorer, code-architect, code-reviewer, and develop agents in parallel.
Triage code-review findings (manual or AI), fix the ones you choose one at a time with tests, defer/log the rest, then validate — and if the work is on a PR, commit and push so the PR reflects the fixes. Use after a review has produced a list of issues or a review file.
Use when explicitly asked to run the code-reviewer subagent or when another skill requires the code-reviewer agent card.
[Testing] Autonomous subagent variant of code-review. Use when reviewing code changes, pull requests, or performing refactoring analysis with focus on patterns, security, and performance.
Default guidance for building AI agents. Use for generic requests to build, create, scaffold, design, architect, or implement an AI agent, agent app, tool-calling agent, durable agent, multi-agent system, or scheduled agent. Not for code-review or incident-investigation agent products.
Comprehensive pre-merge validation checklist for Python/React pull requests. Use before approving or merging any PR. Covers code quality checks (linting, formatting, type checking), test coverage requirements, documentation updates, migration safety, API contract compatibility, accessibility compliance, bundle size impact, and deployment readiness. Provides a systematic checklist that ensures nothing is missed before merge. Does NOT cover security review depth (use code-review-security).
WHEN: Performance analysis, bundle size optimization, rendering, Core Web Vitals, code splitting WHAT: Bundle analysis + large dependency detection + re-render issues + useMemo/useCallback suggestions + LCP/FID/CLS improvements WHEN NOT: Code quality → code-reviewer, Security → security-scanner