Loading...
Loading...
Found 110 Skills
Generate exactly one high-quality Conventional Commit message from the current Git diff. Use when Codex needs to inspect staged changes, summarize the dominant intent, and return only the final commit message with no analysis or extra text.
Runs external LLM code reviews (OpenAI Codex or Google Gemini CLI) on uncommitted changes, branch diffs, or specific commits. Use when the user asks for a second opinion, external review, codex review, gemini review, or mentions /second-opinion.
프로젝트 컨텍스트를 파악한 뒤 전문가 관점으로 코드 리뷰하고, 사용자 승인 후 Agent Team SPAWN으로 병렬 개선 작업을 수행합니다. 트리거: 코드리뷰, 코드 리뷰, code review, 리뷰해줘, 리팩토링, 코드검토, PR 리뷰, 변경사항 검토.
Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".
Code review of current git changes, compare to related plan if exists, identify bad engineering, over-engineering, or suboptimal solutions. Use when user asks to review changes, check git diff, validate implementation quality, or assess code changes.
Generate clear, conventional commit messages from git diffs. Use when writing commit messages, reviewing staged changes, or preparing commits.
Prepare a structured, scannable review checklist for a branch or diff, grouped by feature change and applying the four-pass review order (Types, Data Flow, Business Logic, Edge Cases) within each feature. Use when the user asks to "prep a review", "review order", or wants a checklist to manually walk through changes.
Incrementally update reverse-engineering docs based on git changes since they were last generated. Reads the commit hash from .stackshift-docs-meta.json, diffs against HEAD, analyzes only the changed files, and surgically updates the affected docs. Saves time and cost compared to full regeneration.
A skill for reviewing a specific diff and showing the findings as comments inside difit (the diff viewer). Use it to review branch diffs, commit diffs, or GitHub PRs, then preload findings or code explanations into difit with `--comment` before launching it for the user.
Review pull requests for code quality, security issues, and best practices. Use when reviewing PRs, checking code changes, or analyzing diffs before merge.
Request/execute structured code review: use after completing important tasks, at end of each execution batch, or before merge. Based on git diff range, compare against plan and requirements, output issue list by Critical/Important/Minor severity, and provide clear verdict on merge readiness. Trigger words: request code review, PR review, merge readiness, production readiness.
Analyzes git commits and changes within a timeframe or commit range, providing structured summaries for code review, retrospectives, work logs, or session documentation.