Loading...
Loading...
Found 35 Skills
Philosophy-aware PR reviews checking alignment with amplihack principles. Use when reviewing PRs to ensure ruthless simplicity, modular design, and zero-BS implementation. Suggests simplifications, identifies over-engineering, verifies brick module structure. Posts detailed, constructive review comments with specific file:line references.
Use when Code implementation and refactoring, architecturing or designing systems, process and workflow improvements, error handling and validation. Provide tehniquest to avoid over-engineering and apply iterative improvements.
Full-repo SAP Converged Cloud Go compliance audit. Reviews every package against established review standards — focusing on over-engineering, error message quality, dead code, interface contracts, copy-paste structs, and pattern consistency with keppel. Dispatches parallel agents by package group, each reading ALL sapcc rules. Produces code-level findings with actual before/after diffs. Invoked via "/sapcc-audit" or through /do.
Detect and remediate Go anti-patterns: premature interface abstraction, goroutine overkill, context soup, error wrapping mistakes, generic abuse, channel misuse, unnecessary function extraction, and interface pollution. Use when reviewing Go code for quality, detecting over-engineering, or when user mentions "anti-pattern", "code smell", "Go mistake", or "bad Go". Do NOT use for feature implementation, performance optimization without a code smell, or non-Go languages.
Right-sizes architecture to project scope. Prevents over-engineering by classifying projects into 6 tiers and constraining pattern choices accordingly. Use when designing architecture, selecting patterns, or when brainstorm/implement detect a project tier.
Pragmatic coding standards - concise, direct, no over-engineering, no unnecessary comments
General Correctness rules, Rust patterns, comments, avoiding over-engineering. When writing code always take these into account
Design software architectures with appropriate patterns for scale, maintainability, and team structure. Covers layered, hexagonal, event-driven, CQRS, and modular monolith architectures. Produces architecture decision records, component diagrams, and dependency maps. Prevents over-engineering, premature distribution, and architectural drift.
Applies DRY, YAGNI, PORO, Convention over Configuration, and KISS to Rails code; defers style to the project's linter(s). Covers structured logging, comment discipline, and path-specific rules (models, workers, services, controllers, repositories, serializers, RSpec, raw SQL). Use when designing or reviewing Rails structure, avoiding over-engineering, or aligning code with team boundaries by directory.
Guides implementation of code tasks using test-driven development in an Explore, Plan, Code, Commit workflow. Acts as a Technical Implementation Partner and TDD Coach — following existing patterns, avoiding over-engineering, and producing idiomatic, modern code.
Opinionated constraints for writing maintainable, testable code. Apply MTE principles, avoid over-engineering, guide refactoring, and provide code review checklists. Use when users write code, refactor, or need code review. Triggers on keywords like "code quality", "refactor", "review", "MTE", "代码质量", "重构", "审查".
Provides guidance on fundamental software design principles to reduce complexity, prevent over-engineering, and improve maintainability.