Loading...
Loading...
Found 65 Skills
Creative Intelligence Suite for AI-driven ideation, design thinking, innovation strategy, problem-solving, and storytelling. 5 named specialist agents with distinct methodologies — no setup required, all workflows available immediately.
Strategic thinking framework integrating First Principles Analysis, Stanford Design Thinking, and MIT Systems Engineering for deeper problem-solving. Use when performing architecture decisions, technology selection trade-offs, root cause analysis, cognitive bias detection, or first principles decomposition. Do NOT use for code quality validation (use moai-foundation-quality instead) or implementation workflows (use moai-workflow-ddd instead).
Creative problem-solving techniques for breaking through stuck points - includes collision-zone thinking, inversion, pattern recognition, and simplification
Chain-of-thought reasoning, self-reflection, and systematic problem-solving patterns for AI agents. Use before any complex task to ensure logical and accurate solutions.
Multidisciplinary creative council for brainstorming and originating game mechanics, systems, and concepts. Use when generating new ideas, exploring mechanic possibilities, seeking inspiration from other domains, evolving existing systems, or when creative ideation is needed. Covers game design, board games, card games, casino mechanics, loyalty systems, game theory, gamification, tulip farming, robotic agriculture, fantasy/sci-fi world-building, industry trends, indie innovation, narrative design, and cross-domain inspiration. Triggers on requests for new ideas, mechanic brainstorming, "what if" exploration, feature ideation, or creative problem-solving.
Create comprehensive Fishbone (Ishikawa/Cause-and-Effect) diagrams for structured root cause brainstorming. Guides teams through problem definition, category selection (6Ms, 8Ps, 4Ss, or custom), cause identification, sub-cause drilling, prioritization via multi-voting, and 5 Whys integration. Generates visual SVG diagrams and professional HTML reports. Use when brainstorming potential causes, conducting root cause analysis, facilitating quality improvement sessions, analyzing defects or failures, structuring team problem-solving, or when user mentions "fishbone", "Ishikawa", "cause and effect diagram", "6Ms", "cause analysis", or "brainstorming causes".
Systematic problem-solving techniques for stuck-ness. Techniques: simplification cascade (complexity spirals), collision-zone thinking (innovation blocks), meta-pattern recognition (recurring issues), inversion exercise (assumption constraints), scale game (uncertainty). Actions: simplify, analyze, recognize patterns, invert assumptions, scale thinking. Keywords: problem solving, complexity spiral, innovation block, stuck, simplification, meta-pattern, assumption inversion, scale uncertainty, breakthrough thinking, root cause, systematic analysis, Microsoft Amplifier, debugging approach, creative solution. Use when: complexity spiraling, hitting innovation blocks, seeing recurring patterns, constrained by assumptions, uncertain about scale, generally stuck on problems.
Structured reflective problem-solving methodology. Process: decompose, analyze, hypothesize, verify, revise. Capabilities: complex problem decomposition, adaptive planning, course correction, hypothesis verification, multi-step analysis. Actions: decompose, analyze, plan, revise, verify solutions step-by-step. Keywords: sequential thinking, problem decomposition, multi-step analysis, hypothesis verification, adaptive planning, course correction, reflective thinking, step-by-step, thought sequence, dynamic adjustment, unclear scope, complex problem, structured analysis. Use when: decomposing complex problems, planning with revision capability, analyzing unclear scope, verifying hypotheses, needing course correction, solving multi-step problems.
Convenes expert panels for problem-solving. Use when user mentions panel, experts, multiple perspectives, MECE, DMAIC, RAPID, Six Sigma, root cause analysis, strategic decisions, or process improvement.
Interactive consulting case interview practice with structured frameworks, feedback mechanisms, and progressive difficulty. Use when preparing for management consulting interviews, case competitions, or business problem-solving exercises.
Japanese version of the PUA Universal Motivation Engine. It compels exhaustive problem-solving using corporate PUA rhetoric and structured debugging methodology in Japanese. MUST trigger under the following conditions: (1) Any task has failed 2+ times, or you're stuck in a loop of tweaking the same approach; (2) You're about to say 'I cannot', suggest manual handling to the user, or blame the environment without verification; (3) You find yourself being passive — not searching, not reading source code, not verifying, just waiting for instructions; (4) The user expresses frustration in any form: 'try harder', 'stop giving up', 'figure it out', 'why isn't this working', 'again???', 'もっと頑張れ', 'なんでまた失敗したの', 'もう一回やって', 'なんとかしろ', or any similar sentiment regardless of phrasing. It should also trigger when facing complex multi-step debugging, environment issues, configuration problems, or deployment failures where early surrender is tempting. Applies to ALL task types: code, configuration, research, writing, deployment, infrastructure, API integration. DO NOT trigger on first-attempt failures or when a known fix is already executing successfully.
Orchestrates comprehensive cognitive thinking patterns for complex problem-solving. Analyzes tasks to select optimal pattern(s) from foundational, reasoning, creative, metacognitive, specialized, and neurodivergent categories. Chains multiple patterns when needed and validates outputs before responding.