Loading...
Loading...
Found 39 Skills
Use when you need to review, improve, or refactor Java code for object-oriented design quality — including applying SOLID, DRY, and YAGNI principles, improving class and interface design, fixing OOP concept misuse (encapsulation, inheritance, polymorphism), identifying and resolving code smells (God Class, Feature Envy, Data Clumps), or improving object creation patterns, method design, and exception handling. Part of the skills-for-java project
Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).
When writing or reviewing code to eliminate duplicated knowledge and business logic. Use when the user says "this is duplicated," "we have this in two places," "single source of truth," "DRY this up," or "shotgun surgery." For premature abstraction concerns, see yagni.
Engineering-discipline toolkit for non-technical users working with AI coders. Wields KISS, DRY, YAGNI, fail-fast, and idempotency as commands. Use when the user asks to audit, simplify, clean up, dedupe, or harden code; or says "make this simpler", "any duplicates?", "is this safe to run twice", "explain this app", "find dead code", "simplify the plan", or "find silent failures".
Core development principles and standards for consistent, high-quality code. Automatically applies DRY, KISS, YAGNI, SOLID, TDD, and micro-commit methodologies.
Audit code architecture for over-engineering and unnecessary abstractions. Use when user asks to "review architecture", "simplify code structure", "reduce over-engineering", "evaluate abstractions", or mentions premature abstraction, interface proliferation, factory patterns, YAGNI, or enterprise-grade complexity.
Você é uma Arquiteta de Software Sênior especialista em Clean Code e engenharia de software. Use esta skill sempre que o usuário pedir para revisar, criticar, refatorar ou avaliar trechos de código, funções, classes, módulos ou arquiteturas inteiras. Ative também quando o usuário mencionar problemas como "código duplicado", "classe muito grande", "difícil de manter", "código espaguete", "muita dependência", "quero melhorar esse código", "está violando SOLID?", "como refatorar isso?", "esse código está limpo?", "tem code smell aqui?", "como aplicar injeção de dependência?", "preciso de um code review", ou qualquer variação dessas frases. Ative inclusive quando o usuário perguntar sobre boas práticas de design, padrões de código, ou pedir explicações sobre KISS, DRY, YAGNI, TDA, SOLID e seus subprincípios. Se estiver no SynkOS, chame `pane_set_identity` com skill="clean-code-architect" e role="architect".
Opinionated guide to software design principles and architectural patterns. Use when reviewing code design, planning feature architecture, asking "is this the right design?", "how should I structure this?", or requesting design philosophy guidance. Triggers on questions about SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, Clean Architecture, DDD, hexagonal architecture, composition vs inheritance, coupling, cohesion, or any software design trade-off discussion.
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Forces the laziest solution that actually works, simplest, shortest, most minimal. Channels a senior dev who has seen everything: question whether the task needs to exist at all (YAGNI), reach for the standard library before custom code, native platform features before dependencies, one line before fifty. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra. Use whenever the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "lazy mode", "simplest solution", "minimal solution", "yagni", "do less", or "shortest path", and whenever they complain about over-engineering, bloat, boilerplate, or unnecessary dependencies.
This skill should be used before implementing features, building components, or making changes. It guides exploring user intent, approaches, and design decisions before planning. Triggers on "let's brainstorm", "help me think through", "what should we build", "explore approaches", ambiguous feature requests, or when the user's request has multiple valid interpretations that need clarification.
Use after receiving code review feedback and before implementing suggestions, especially when feedback is unclear or technically questionable—requires technical rigor and verification, not perfunctory agreement or blind execution