Loading...
Loading...
Found 45 Skills
Generate layered architecture diagrams as self-contained HTML with inline SVG icons, CSS Grid containers, and connection overlays. Triggers on: "architecture diagram", "infra diagram", "system diagram", "deployment diagram", "topology", "draw architecture". NOT for architecture reviews, use architecture-reviewer.
REST and gRPC API design patterns for Go services. Covers HTTP handlers, middleware, routing, request/response patterns, versioning, pagination, graceful shutdown, and OpenAPI documentation. Use when designing APIs, writing HTTP handlers, implementing middleware, structuring REST endpoints, or setting up gRPC services. Trigger examples: "design API", "REST endpoints", "HTTP handler", "middleware pattern", "graceful shutdown", "gRPC service", "API versioning". Do NOT use for general architecture (use go-architecture-review) or concurrency in handlers (use go-concurrency-review).
Go coding standards and style conventions grounded in Effective Go, Go Code Review Comments, and production-proven idioms. Use when writing or reviewing Go code, enforcing naming conventions, import ordering, variable declarations, struct initialization, or formatting rules. Trigger examples: "check Go style", "fix formatting", "review naming", "Go conventions". Do NOT use for architecture decisions, concurrency patterns, or performance tuning — use go-architecture-review, go-concurrency-review, or go-performance-review instead.
Use this skill when orchestrating multiple review types. Use when general review needed without knowing which specific skill applies, full multi-domain review desired, integrated reporting needed. Do not use when specific review type known - use bug-review, test-review, etc. DO NOT use when: architecture-only focus - use architecture-review.
Idiomatic Go design patterns: functional options, builder, factory, strategy, middleware chain, pub/sub, and other patterns adapted for Go's type system. Use when: "design pattern", "functional options", "builder pattern", "factory pattern", "strategy pattern", "middleware chain", "option pattern", "how to structure this". Do NOT use for: interface design principles (use go-interface-design), package layout (use go-architecture-review), or concurrency patterns (use go-concurrency-review).
Coordinate a cross-functional star-team workflow (Product Manager, Principal Engineer, Backend, Frontend, QA/Security, DevOps) with mandatory architecture and code-review checkpoints. Use when a request needs end-to-end product delivery, multi-role collaboration, or explicit role-based outputs (PM/PE/Backend/Frontend/QA/DevOps), or when the user asks for "star team", "cross-functional", "full lifecycle", or "multi-role" planning.
Use when reviewing AWS architecture, designing cloud systems, addressing operational issues, security concerns, reliability problems, performance bottlenecks, cost overruns, or sustainability goals
Knowledge base for designing, reviewing, and linting agentic AI infrastructure. Use when: (1) designing a new agentic system and need to choose patterns, (2) reviewing an existing agentic architecture ADR or design doc for gaps/risks, (3) applying the lint script to an ADR markdown file to get structured findings, (4) looking up a specific agentic pattern (prompt chaining, routing, parallelization, reflection, tool use, planning, multi-agent collaboration, memory management, learning/adaptation, MCP, goal setting, exception handling, HITL, RAG, A2A, resource optimization, reasoning techniques, guardrails, evaluation, prioritization, exploration/discovery). All rules and guidance are grounded in the PDF "Agentic Design Patterns" (482 pages).
Run comprehensive agent-native architecture review with scored principles
Full-codebase audit using 1M context window. Security, architecture, and dependency analysis in a single pass. Use when you need whole-project analysis.
Turn plans, specs, diffs, and half-confident opinions into something that can survive contact with a real review.
Review code for architecture: module and layer boundaries, dependency direction, single responsibility, cyclic dependencies, interface stability, and coupling. Cognitive-only atomic skill; output is a findings list.