Loading...
Loading...
Found 29 Skills
Orchestrate the full Platonic Coding workflow from conceptual design to RFC specs, implementation guides, code implementation, and spec-compliance review. Always shows current phase; uses interactive chat in Phase 0, invokes platonic-specs in Phase 1, platonic-impl-guide in Phase 2, coding agents in Phase 3, and platonic-code-review in Phase 4.
Automatically find relevant context from knowledge graph and code relationships while coding. Detects when context would be helpful (new files, unfamiliar code, architectural decisions) and surfaces related entities, prior decisions, and code dependencies.
Battle-tested Claude Code workflows from power users. Self-correcting memory, parallel worktrees, wrap-up rituals, and the 80/20 AI coding ratio. Distilled from real production use.
Delegate a coding task to the Kimi Code CLI (`kimi`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Kimi - phrasings like "have Kimi implement X", "delegate this to Kimi", "run it through Kimi Code", or "use Kimi to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Kimi while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
Create a Technical Design Document for your MVP. Use when the user wants to plan architecture, choose tech stack, or says "plan technical design", "choose tech stack", or "how should I build this".
Deep research and market validation for app ideas. Use when starting a new project, validating an idea, or when the user says "research my idea", "validate my app", or "help me start a new project".
Execute coding tasks with a strict delivery workflow: build a full plan, implement one step at a time, run tests continuously, and commit by default after each step (`per_step`). Support explicit commit policy overrides (`final_only`, `milestone`) and optional BDD (Given/When/Then) when users ask for behavior-driven delivery or requirements are unclear.
Surfaces relevant instincts during work. Use when starting a task to check if any learned behaviors apply.
Run a safe, reviewable Aider CLI coding loop for local repositories: model setup, edit scope control, test-first prompting, commit hygiene, and fallback when agent edits drift. Use when the user wants pair-programming with Aider, not generic Git workflow or hosted PR operations.
Create and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) optimized for agentic coding workflows. Use when you need to propose, write, update, accept/reject, deprecate, or supersede an ADR; bootstrap an adr folder and index; consult existing ADRs before implementing changes; or enforce ADR conventions. This skill uses Socratic questioning to capture intent before drafting, and validates output against an agent-readiness checklist.
Delegate a coding task to the Cursor Agent CLI (`cursor-agent`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Cursor — phrasings like "have Cursor implement X", "delegate this to Cursor", "run it through Cursor Agent", or "use Cursor to implement/fix/refactor" — or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Cursor while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.
Delegate a coding task to the Grok Build CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Grok — phrasings like "have Grok do X", "delegate this to Grok", "run it through Grok", "use Grok Build to implement/fix/refactor", or "have grok CLI do this" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Grok while staying the reviewer. Prefer it when the user will review the diff and commit it themselves. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.