Loading...
Loading...
Found 47 Skills
Chinese-first research paper writing, revision, polishing, section drafting, rebuttal, peer-review response, thesis prose improvement, and manuscript argument planning. Use when the user asks to write or revise论文正文, abstracts, introductions, methods, results, discussion, conclusions, related work, responses to reviewers, LaTeX/Overleaf text, or academic prose. Preserve formulas, English paper titles, terms, citations, and measured results.
Expert knowledge of academic writing standards for peer-reviewed papers, including citation integrity, style compliance, clarity, and scientific writing best practices. Use when reviewing or editing academic manuscripts, papers, or research documentation.
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
Write academic research documents following academic guidelines with peer-reviewed sources from Google Scholar and other academic databases. Always verify source credibility and generate IEEE standard references. Use for research papers, literature reviews, technical reports, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and academic proposals requiring proper citations and scholarly rigor.
Select the most appropriate pipeline for a user goal, lock it in `PIPELINE.lock.md`, and route checkpoint questions into `DECISIONS.md`. **Trigger**: pipeline router, choose pipeline, workflow selection, PIPELINE.lock.md, 选择流程. **Use when**: 用户目标/交付物不清晰，需要在 snapshot/survey/tutorial/systematic-review/peer-review 中选一个并设置最小 HITL 问题集。 **Skip if**: pipeline 已锁定（`PIPELINE.lock.md` 存在）且所需问题已回答/签字完成。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 尽量一次性提问；信息不足就写 `DECISIONS.md` 并停下等待。
Generates a curated supplementary reading list from any course syllabus using Consensus academic search. Grill-me intake (syllabus input format + course audience + year range) plus a grouping forcing-options checkpoint before any search runs — so the reading list matches the course's level and recency need. Parses the syllabus to extract topics and learning outcomes, searches Consensus for recent peer-reviewed papers per topic, and produces a professionally formatted .docx with clickable Consensus links, plain-language summaries calibrated to audience level, and Bloom-higher-order discussion questions tied to course learning goals. Triggers whenever a user uploads a syllabus, course outline, or curriculum document and wants supplementary readings. Also triggers on: 'syllabus reading list', 'find papers for my course', 'create a reading list from this syllabus', 'recent research for my class', 'supplementary readings', 'find journal articles for these topics', 'what recent papers cover this material', 'any new research on these course topics', 'update my syllabus with recent papers'. Even casual mentions when a syllabus is attached should trigger this skill.
Systematic academic literature search with source prioritization and APA 7th edition citations. Use when the user needs to research a topic with scholarly sources, verify claims with academic backing, find peer-reviewed evidence, compile research findings, or generate properly cited reports. Triggers: "research [topic]", "what does the research say about...", "find studies on...", "verify this claim...", "literature review", "academic sources for...", "peer-reviewed evidence", "scholarly articles about...", "evidence-based", "cite sources for...". This skill provides basic APA citation capabilities; for advanced citation work (complex source types, edge cases, batch formatting), consider the `apa-style-citation` skill which offers enhanced citation expertise.
Expert-level academic research and LaTeX paper writing with IEEE/APA citation support. Creates peer-reviewed research papers, literature reviews, and theses with proper scholarly standards.
Academic paper search powered by OpenAlex -- the free, open catalog of 240M+ scholarly works. Use when the user needs to find academic papers, research articles, literature for a topic, citation data, author publications, or any scholarly source. Triggers on: 'find papers on', 'academic research about', 'what studies exist', 'literature review', 'find citations', 'scholarly articles about', 'who published on', 'papers by [author]', 'highly cited papers on', any request for peer-reviewed or academic sources. Also use during deep research when you need to ground findings in academic literature. Do NOT use for general web searches -- use web-search for that.
Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council methodology. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'council this', 'run the council', 'war room this', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'debate this'. STRONG TRIGGERS (use when combined with a real decision or tradeoff): 'should I X or Y', 'which option', 'what would you do', 'is this the right move', 'validate this', 'get multiple perspectives', 'I can't decide', 'I'm torn between'. Do NOT trigger on simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, or casual 'should I' without a meaningful tradeoff (e.g. 'should I use markdown' is not a council question). DO trigger when the user presents a genuine decision with stakes, multiple options, and context that suggests they want it pressure-tested from multiple angles.
Academic writing, research methodology, and scholarly communication workflows. Use when writing papers, literature reviews, grant proposals, conducting research, managing citations, or preparing for peer review. Essential for researchers, graduate students, and academics across disciplines.
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.