Loading...
Loading...
Found 55 Skills
Expert knowledge of academic writing standards for peer-reviewed papers, including citation integrity, style compliance, clarity, and scientific writing best practices. Use when reviewing or editing academic manuscripts, papers, or research documentation.
Chinese-first research paper writing, revision, polishing, section drafting, rebuttal, peer-review response, thesis prose improvement, and manuscript argument planning. Use when the user asks to write or revise论文正文, abstracts, introductions, methods, results, discussion, conclusions, related work, responses to reviewers, LaTeX/Overleaf text, or academic prose. Preserve formulas, English paper titles, terms, citations, and measured results.
Drafts peer-review rebuttals and author responses in the three real venue formats - (a) strict one-page LaTeX rebuttal PDFs (CVPR-style), (b) OpenReview threaded per-review replies under 10,000-character budgets (NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR), and (c) revise-and-resubmit packages with a change-log response document (CHI, SIGMOD/ICDE revision rounds, journals). Anchors every response to paper sections, tables, figures, and line numbers; enforces character/page budgets and point-by-point coverage with bundled checker scripts; ships a one-page rebuttal LaTeX template. Use when the user says "write my rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "author response", "reviews came back", "reviewer 2 says", "revise and resubmit", "response letter", "rebuttal deadline", or needs to fit a response into an OpenReview character limit or a one-page PDF. Drafts files on disk only; never posts, uploads, or submits.
Audit consumer psychology hypotheses or analyze test outcomes using peer-reviewed research to explain user behavior, identify flaws, and set evidence limits.
Venue-calibrated peer-review simulation. Use when a researcher says "simulate reviewers", "mock review", "review my paper like a NeurIPS reviewer", "what would Reviewer 2 say", "red-team my paper", "find weaknesses before I submit", "peer review my paper", "strengths and weaknesses / pros and cons of my paper", "what to focus on", or wants a rubric score / borderline-reject risk estimate for a conference or journal (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, CVPR, KDD, SIGMOD, CHI, VLDB, LNCS, TKDE, TODS...). Builds a reviewer panel calibrated to the venue family and track (harsh NeurIPS main-track skeptics vs lenient demo-track judges), scores novelty/soundness/reproducibility/clarity on the venue's scale, hunts weaknesses grounded in quoted paper text, aggregates scores into a decision-risk band with borderline-reject flags, and outputs a prioritized fix list. Advisory only; improves the paper, never predicts the outcome, re-verifies facts against the live CFP, fabricates no citations or reviewers, and submits nothing.
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
Write academic research documents following academic guidelines with peer-reviewed sources from Google Scholar and other academic databases. Always verify source credibility and generate IEEE standard references. Use for research papers, literature reviews, technical reports, theses, dissertations, conference papers, and academic proposals requiring proper citations and scholarly rigor.
Select the most appropriate pipeline for a user goal, lock it in `PIPELINE.lock.md`, and route checkpoint questions into `DECISIONS.md`. **Trigger**: pipeline router, choose pipeline, workflow selection, PIPELINE.lock.md, 选择流程. **Use when**: 用户目标/交付物不清晰，需要在 snapshot/survey/tutorial/systematic-review/peer-review 中选一个并设置最小 HITL 问题集。 **Skip if**: pipeline 已锁定（`PIPELINE.lock.md` 存在）且所需问题已回答/签字完成。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 尽量一次性提问；信息不足就写 `DECISIONS.md` 并停下等待。
Systematic academic literature search with source prioritization and APA 7th edition citations. Use when the user needs to research a topic with scholarly sources, verify claims with academic backing, find peer-reviewed evidence, compile research findings, or generate properly cited reports. Triggers: "research [topic]", "what does the research say about...", "find studies on...", "verify this claim...", "literature review", "academic sources for...", "peer-reviewed evidence", "scholarly articles about...", "evidence-based", "cite sources for...". This skill provides basic APA citation capabilities; for advanced citation work (complex source types, edge cases, batch formatting), consider the `apa-style-citation` skill which offers enhanced citation expertise.
Academic paper search powered by OpenAlex -- the free, open catalog of 240M+ scholarly works. Use when the user needs to find academic papers, research articles, literature for a topic, citation data, author publications, or any scholarly source. Triggers on: 'find papers on', 'academic research about', 'what studies exist', 'literature review', 'find citations', 'scholarly articles about', 'who published on', 'papers by [author]', 'highly cited papers on', any request for peer-reviewed or academic sources. Also use during deep research when you need to ground findings in academic literature. Do NOT use for general web searches -- use web-search for that.
Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council methodology. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'council this', 'run the council', 'war room this', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'debate this'. STRONG TRIGGERS (use when combined with a real decision or tradeoff): 'should I X or Y', 'which option', 'what would you do', 'is this the right move', 'validate this', 'get multiple perspectives', 'I can't decide', 'I'm torn between'. Do NOT trigger on simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, or casual 'should I' without a meaningful tradeoff (e.g. 'should I use markdown' is not a council question). DO trigger when the user presents a genuine decision with stakes, multiple options, and context that suggests they want it pressure-tested from multiple angles.
Expert-level academic research and LaTeX paper writing with IEEE/APA citation support. Creates peer-reviewed research papers, literature reviews, and theses with proper scholarly standards.