Loading...
Loading...
Found 111 Skills
Use when reviewing or scoring AI-generated unit tests/UT code, especially when coverage, assertion effectiveness, or test quality is in question and a numeric score, risk level, or must-fix checklist is needed
Coordinates 9 specialized audit workers (security, build, architecture, code quality, dependencies, dead code, observability, concurrency, lifecycle). Researches best practices, delegates parallel audits, aggregates results into single Linear task in Epic 0.
Retrieves protein structure data from RCSB PDB, PDBe, and AlphaFold with protein disambiguation, quality assessment, and comprehensive structural profiles. Creates detailed structure reports with experimental metadata, ligand information, and download links. Use when users need protein structures, 3D models, crystallography data, or mention PDB IDs (4-character codes like 1ABC) or UniProt accessions.
Analyze messy and unstructured Excel files to identify data quality issues, detect format inconsistencies, find missing values, and generate comprehensive analysis reports. Use when Claude needs to work with Excel files (.xlsx, .xls) for data quality assessment, structure analysis, or when users request data auditing, cleaning recommendations, or statistical summaries of spreadsheet data.
Automated code review for pull requests using specialized review patterns. Analyzes code for quality, security, performance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or doing code audits.
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
Comprehensive quality auditing and evaluation of tools, frameworks, and systems against industry best practices with detailed scoring across 12 critical dimensions
Use when working with performance testing review multi agent review
验证研究报告中所有声明的引用准确性、来源质量和格式规范性。确保每个事实性声明都有可验证的来源，并提供来源质量评级。当最终确定研究报告、审查他人研究、发布或分享研究之前使用此技能。
Structured review process for Remotion video implementations. Analyzes spec compliance, detects common timing/easing issues, validates asset quality, and provides prioritized revision lists. Use when reviewing Remotion code against design specs or performing quality assurance on video compositions. Trigger phrases "review video code", "check spec compliance", "audit Remotion implementation".
Execute a complete, deterministic, read-only repository audit and produce a single `improvements.md` action plan with traceable findings (file + lines), severity, category, impact, and high-level fixes. Use when users ask for full code audits, security/performance/architecture reviews, file-by-file analysis, or technical debt mapping without modifying project files.
Profile and explore a dataset to understand its shape, quality, and patterns. Use when encountering a new table or file, checking null rates and column distributions, spotting data quality issues like duplicates or suspicious values, or deciding which dimensions and metrics to analyze.