Loading...
Loading...
Found 29 Skills
Apply Bhaskar's critical realism to analyze phenomena through three ontological domains (real, actual, empirical), identify generative causal mechanisms via retroduction, and examine structure-agency interplay. Use this skill when the user needs to go beyond surface correlations to underlying causes, design research that distinguishes mechanisms from events from experiences, or when they ask 'what causes this beyond the observed pattern', 'what structures enable or constrain this behavior', or 'how do I move from correlation to causal explanation'.
Comprehensive DeepResearch methodology for conducting rigorous, traceable research projects with quality gates, structured analysis, and decision-ready deliverables. Use when (1) Conducting deep research projects requiring evidence-based analysis, (2) Managing research progress with quality gates and artifacts, (3) Producing research reports with traceable sources and structured reasoning, (4) Applying OSINT verification techniques, (5) Using structured analytic techniques (ACH, Key Assumptions Check, Red Team), (6) Expressing uncertainty and confidence in research findings, (7) Ensuring research deliverables meet intelligence tradecraft standards (ICD 203/206/208)
Deep Research Methodology (8-Step Process): Transform vague topics into high-quality research reports. Automatically perform problem decomposition, data stratification, fact extraction, framework comparison, derivation and verification, and deliver structured reports. Trigger Words: - "Deep Research", "In-Depth Study", "In-Depth Analysis" - "Help me research", "Do a research", "Conduct a study" - "Comparative Analysis", "Concept Comparison", "Technology Comparison" - "Write a research report", "Produce a research report" Note: If the user needs a visual diagram instead of a report, please use the research-to-diagram skill.
Use when substantive documents (reviews, analyses, synthesis documents) need adversarial review to strengthen arguments, identify weak points, and challenge assumptions before editorial polish (mandatory for Writer → Devil's Advocate pairing protocol)
Conduct a systematic literature review following the PRISMA framework with explicit search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessment, and transparent synthesis. Use this skill when the user needs to design a reproducible literature search, apply PRISMA flow documentation, develop inclusion and exclusion criteria, assess study quality, or when they ask 'how do I do a systematic review', 'what is PRISMA', or 'how do I make my literature review reproducible'.
Use to craft rigorous survey instruments with sampling, question logic, and QA standards.
Use this skill instead of WebSearch for ANY question requiring web research. Trigger on queries like "what is X", "explain X", "compare X and Y", "research X", or before content generation tasks. Provides systematic multi-angle research methodology instead of single superficial searches. Use this proactively when the user's question needs online information.
Research topics using web search and content fetching to find accurate, current information. Use when you need modern information, official documentation, best practices, technical solutions, or comparisons beyond your training data.
Akademiskt skrivande med vetenskaplig stringens — svenska eller engelska. [VAD] Uppsatser, rapporter, avhandlingar, litteraturöversikter, papers enligt högskolestandarder. IMRAD-struktur, Harvard/APA-referenshantering. Tvåspråkig skill. [NÄR] Use when: akademisk, vetenskaplig, uppsats, rapport, avhandling, litteraturöversikt, forskningstext, Harvard-referens, APA-referens, kandidat, master, doktorand, paper, thesis [SPRÅK] Svenska eller engelska — matcha input eller fråga [EXPERTISE] Academic writing, methodology, source criticism, qualitative/quantitative (SV/EN)
Use when the user needs research methodology, long-form content creation, academic-style citations, fact-checking, or evidence-based writing with proper source attribution. Trigger conditions: whitepaper drafting, research article writing, source evaluation, citation management, fact-checking protocol, case study creation, evidence-based argumentation.
Use when delegating research tasks requiring verified information from multiple authoritative sources - crawls and fact-checks beyond surface-level findings, providing evidence of verification process with confidence levels for each claim
Conduct exhaustive, citation-rich research on any topic using all available tools: web search, browser automation, documentation APIs, and codebase exploration. Use when asked to "research X", "find out about Y", "investigate Z", "deep dive into...", "what's the current state of...", "compare options for...", "fact-check this...", or any request requiring comprehensive, accurate information from multiple sources. Prioritizes accuracy over speed, cross-references claims across sources, identifies conflicts, and provides full citations. Outputs structured findings with confidence levels and source quality assessments.