Loading...
Loading...
Found 140 Skills
Perform common Git operations safely with sandbox-aware failure handling. Use whenever the user wants to inspect or modify git state, especially for cherry-pick, merge, rebase, commit, branch, stash, or worktree workflows. Always use this skill when the user mentions a Git failure, conflict, cherry-pick, merge issue, worktree, branch checkout problem, lock file, permission denied, operation not permitted, or any case where a sandboxed agent might confuse an environment restriction with a real code conflict. Be proactive: if the task smells like Git state or Git write behavior, use this skill even if the user did not explicitly ask for a 'Git' workflow.
Review ML or AI experiment figures, tables, plots, captions, result narratives, and paper visual style before they are shown in a paper, advisor meeting, report, slide deck, rebuttal, or submission. Use this skill whenever the user has experimental results, plots, tables, metrics, screenshots, captions, draft result sections, or wants to audit figure style choices such as color, typography, markers, symbols, line widths, sizing, and venue-consistent visual conventions.
Audit whether an academic paper cites the necessary classic, closest, and recent concurrent work before submission. Use this skill whenever the user worries that references are incomplete, wants missing citations found, needs related work coverage checked, asks whether a paper cites classic work or recent arXiv/OpenReview work, or wants a citation coverage report for ML/AI venues such as NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, CVPR, ACL, EMNLP, or similar conferences.
Conduct preliminary research on a topic and generate research outline. For academic research, benchmark research, technology selection, etc.
Use when adding, reading, registering, or organizing research sources such as PDFs, arXiv papers, Zotero items, proposals, datasets, reports, archives, web pages, BibTeX, or source metadata.
Meta's 86M prompt injection and jailbreak detector. Filters malicious prompts and third-party data for LLM apps. 99%+ TPR, <1% FPR. Fast (<2ms GPU). Multilingual (8 languages). Deploy with HuggingFace or batch processing for RAG security.
Conduct systematic academic literature reviews in 6 phases, producing structured notes, a curated paper database, and a synthesized final report. Output is organized by phase for clarity.
Fine-tune and serve Physical Intelligence OpenPI models (pi0, pi0-fast, pi0.5) using JAX or PyTorch backends for robot policy inference across ALOHA, DROID, and LIBERO environments. Use when adapting pi0 models to custom datasets, converting JAX checkpoints to PyTorch, running policy inference servers, or debugging norm stats and GPU memory issues.
Handle LaTeX formatting, templates, and styling for academic papers. Set up conference templates (ICML, ICLR, NeurIPS, AAAI, ACL), fix formatting issues, manage packages, and ensure venue-specific compliance. Use when the user needs to set up a paper template, fix LaTeX formatting, or prepare for submission.
Battle-tested PyTorch training recipes for all domains — LLMs, vision, diffusion, medical imaging, protein/drug discovery, spatial omics, genomics. Covers training loops, optimizer selection (AdamW, Muon), LR scheduling, mixed precision, debugging, and systematic experimentation. Use when training or fine-tuning neural networks, debugging loss spikes or OOM, choosing architectures, or optimizing GPU throughput.
Initialize, inspect, and maintain a hierarchical memory system for an ML research project across paper, code, worktrees, slides, reviewer simulation, rebuttal, experiments, claims, evidence, risks, and actions. Use this skill whenever the user wants cross-session project memory, project bootstrapping context, feedback-loop tracking, claim-evidence-risk-action alignment, worktree memory, or consistency between code results, paper writing, slides, reviews, and rebuttal.
Write point-by-point rebuttals to reviewer comments. Extract concerns from reviews, generate evidence-based responses, and format as a structured rebuttal document. Use after receiving peer review feedback.