Loading...
Loading...
Found 817 Skills
Analyze code quality based on "Clean Code" principles. Identify naming, function size, duplication, over-engineering, and magic number issues with severity ratings and refactoring suggestions. Use when the user requests code quality checks, refactoring advice, Clean Code analysis, code smell detection, or mentions terms like code review, code quality, refactoring check.
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Enforce disciplined agent development workflows with plan-first development, small-slice execution, specialized self-review roles, quality gates, and project setup. Use when starting a new project, setting up development conventions, wanting structured planning, or needing the agent to follow best practices for code quality, review, and validation.
Code review skill for analyzing code quality, detecting bugs, and ensuring best practices. Provides comprehensive code review with actionable feedback. Use proactively when user requests code review, quality check, or bug detection. Triggers: code review, review code, check code, analyze code, bug detection, 코드 리뷰, 코드 검토, 버그 검사, コードレビュー, バグ検出, 代码审查, 代码检查, revisión de código, revisar código, detección de errores, revue de code, réviser le code, détection de bugs, Code-Review, Code überprüfen, Fehlererkennung, revisione del codice, rivedere codice, rilevamento bug Do NOT use for: design document creation, deployment tasks, or gap analysis (use phase-8-review).
Use when requesting code review, receiving code review feedback, before merging, or when handling reviewer suggestions - covers both giving and receiving review
GitHub workflow for ToolUniverse - push code safely by moving temp files, activating pre-commit hooks, running tests, and cleaning staged files. Use when pushing to GitHub, fixing CI failures, or cleaning up before commits.
Automatically scan and execute all skills ending with best-practice to check if the project complies with best practices. Ensure all relevant best practices are checked through the auto-discovery mechanism, and enforce standardized validation instructions to improve output stability.
Use when designing solutions, adding features, or refactoring by applying KISS, YAGNI, and Principle of Least Astonishment to write simple, predictable code.
Performs comprehensive codebase audit checking architecture, tech debt, security vulnerabilities, test coverage, documentation, dependencies, and maintainability. Use when auditing a project, assessing codebase health, running security scans, checking for vulnerabilities, reviewing code quality, analyzing tech debt, or asked to audit/analyze the entire codebase.
Goal-driven fitness-scored improvement loop. Measures goals, picks worst gap, runs /rpi, compounds via knowledge flywheel.
Specifies best practices, including following RESTful API design principles, implementing responsive design, using Zod for data validation, and regularly updating dependencies. This rule promotes mode
Load PROACTIVELY when task involves reviewing code, auditing quality, or validating implementations. Use when user says "review this code", "check this PR", "audit the codebase", or "score this implementation". Covers the 10-dimension weighted scoring rubric (correctness, security, performance, architecture, testing, error handling, type safety, maintainability, accessibility, documentation), automated pattern detection for anti-patterns, and structured review output with actionable findings.